The Department of Justice's official running case record for the 737 MAX criminal fraud matter, listing each procedural milestone and linking the underlying court documents (deferred prosecution agreement, criminal information, court orders, non-prosecution agreement, and dismissal order).
Boeing 737 MAX Safety Oversight
Accountability file
A public-record case file for U.S. safety-oversight and accountability records concerning the Boeing 737 MAX (2019-2026): the federal criminal fraud matter, NTSB accident investigations, FAA regulatory action, DOT Inspector General audits, and congressional oversight. In the criminal matter (United States v. The Boeing Company, N.D. Tex. No. 4:21-cr-00005-O), the Department of Justice charged Boeing with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States and entered a 2021 deferred prosecution agreement; DOJ later determined Boeing breached that agreement (2024), a proposed guilty-plea agreement was filed and then rejected by the court (December 5, 2024), and the case was ultimately resolved by a non-prosecution agreement (May 29, 2025) and dismissed (November 6, 2025). Boeing was not convicted in this matter, and the crash-victim families' mandamus appeal was denied by the Fifth Circuit (March 31, 2026, with a rehearing petition pending); the file keeps official court, safety-investigation, audit, and legislative records separate and never treats a charge, agreement, or dismissal as a conviction.
- Updated
- Mar 31, 2026
- Source Anchors
- 17 verified
- Timeline
- 19 events
- Roles
- 12 public-record
- Fingerprint
9D91 2C89 337A
How the public record connects
This shows the case file's most significant public-record connections only — see the Role Web and Timeline tabs for the full set. A line means a record connects two points; it is not a finding about conduct.
Publishing limits
These are the standards every anchor on this file must clear.
- Minimum source tier
- official record
- court docket
- oversight report
- audit report
- legislative record
- Living people
- For named individuals (pilots, officials, executives, the presiding judge), publish only source-backed public roles and exact record relationships; do not infer motive or blame, and never describe the corporate defendant's dismissed case as a conviction.
- Victim protection
- Treat crash and incident casualties and their families with dignity: publish no graphic detail, and no personal or next-of-kin identifying information beyond names already entered in the public court record as CVRA participants.
- Social leads
- Social posts, secondary coverage, and reported figures can start a lead, but promotion requires an official court, safety-investigation, audit, or legislative record; quarantined figures such as the rejected plea's dollar terms and any production-cap number stay in the research queue until sourced.
No guilt by proximity
An agency, company, official, or record appearing in the same 737 MAX timeline is context only and does not prove wrongdoing, causation, or a conviction; charges, agreements, audits, and accident findings each prove only what their own record states.
People, institutions, and the records between them
Every public-record role in this file, grouped by kind. Open a role to read its dossier — its public-record status, what it is, and the exact records that name it. A shared record naming two roles is not a finding about conduct beyond that record.
Every public-record role
Pick a role to see its public-record status, what it is, and the exact records that name it. A shared record is not a finding about conduct.
The public docket mirror for the criminal case, listing filings including the felony information and the deferred prosecution agreement, sourced from PACER via RECAP.
DOJ's January 2021 announcement of the deferred prosecution agreement, the single conspiracy charge, and the monetary terms, describing the conduct Boeing admitted concerning the FAA Aircraft Evaluation Group and the MCAS flight-control feature.
DOT OIG audit of FAA's certification of the 737 MAX 8 and its oversight of Boeing's Organization Designation Authorization, finding guidance and process weaknesses around MCAS and delegated authority.
DOT OIG audit of FAA oversight of Boeing 737 and 787 production, concluding that FAA's oversight processes are not effective at identifying and resolving production issues.
The Committee's release of its 238-page majority-staff final report on the design, development, and certification of the 737 MAX after an 18-month investigation, identifying failures at both Boeing and the FAA.
The federal inspectors-general community repository entry recording the January 2021 DOJ and DOT Inspector General announcement of the 737 MAX fraud resolution.
Chairman Roger Wicker's December 2020 release of the Committee's investigation report on the FAA, drawing on whistleblower disclosures related to the 737 MAX and FAA oversight.
A nonpartisan CRS overview of FAA oversight of Boeing, summarizing the certification history, the 2024 door-plug event, statutory reforms, and ongoing oversight challenges.
FAA's consolidated public log of its regulatory and enforcement actions on the 737-9 and 737 MAX following the January 5, 2024 door-plug event.
NTSB's announcement of the adopted probable cause for the January 2024 in-flight door-plug separation, identifying Boeing manufacturing-process failures and ineffective FAA oversight.
The full adopted NTSB final report on the door-plug separation, containing the factual record, analysis, probable cause, findings, and safety recommendations.
The NTSB investigation landing page recording the accident particulars, injury summary, current status, and links to the investigation docket and final report.
Timeline
- active investigation / official#Lion Air flight JT610 crashesA Boeing 737-8 operated by Lion Air as flight JT610 departed Soekarno-Hatta Airport in Jakarta and crashed into the Java Sea approximately 13 minutes later. One hundred and eighty-four passengers and five crew were on board and there were no survivors. An Indonesian-led investigation followed, supported by the NTSB, FAA, and Boeing.The accident is stated as a factual event, as recorded in the FAA's findings. This file addresses the procedural record and does not publish graphic or casualty detail, and an accident is not by itself a finding of fault against any party.
- active investigation / official#Ethiopian Airlines flight ET302 crashesA second Boeing 737-8, Ethiopian Airlines flight ET302, departed Bole International Airport in Addis Ababa for Nairobi and crashed near Bishoftu six minutes after takeoff. One hundred and forty-nine passengers and eight crew were on board and none survived. An Ethiopian-led investigation followed, supported by the NTSB, FAA, and Boeing. Together the two accidents killed 346 people.The accident is stated as a factual event, as recorded in the FAA's findings. Investigative causation was determined by the national authorities leading each inquiry and should not be inferred from this row.
- oversight finding / official#FAA grounds the 737 MAX by emergency orderThe FAA Acting Administrator issued an Emergency Order of Prohibition, effective immediately, barring U.S. certificated operators from flying Boeing 737-8 and 737-9 airplanes and barring their operation in U.S. territory. The order states that on March 13 the ET302 investigation developed new wreckage information which, with refined satellite tracking data, indicated similarities to JT610 warranting investigation of a possible shared cause. It was published at 84 FR 9705 and remained in effect until rescinded.An emergency grounding is a precautionary safety action taken on preliminary evidence. The order expressly describes the shared-cause question as something to be investigated, and is not a finding that any party caused either accident.
- oversight finding / official#House committee issues final 737 MAX reportAfter an 18-month investigation, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee released a 238-page majority-staff report identifying failures in the design, development, and certification of the 737 MAX at both Boeing and the FAA. The Senate Commerce Committee released its own FAA investigation report on December 18, 2020.Committee investigative conclusions; some content reflects whistleblower allegations labeled as such in the reports.
- oversight finding / official#FAA rescinds the grounding orderFAA Administrator Steve Dickson signed a rescission of the March 2019 grounding order, the agency's official ungrounding of the 737 MAX after roughly twenty months. The FAA issued an Airworthiness Directive mandating corrective actions and a Flight Standardization Board report setting minimum pilot training requirements the same day; return to service was conditioned on operators completing that work.A rescission records that the agency judged its emergency prohibition no longer necessary. It is the FAA's account of its own process, and the DOT Inspector General reports elsewhere in this file reach separate conclusions about the adequacy of that oversight.
- charge / official#DOJ files criminal information and deferred prosecution agreementThe Department of Justice filed a one-count criminal information charging Boeing with conspiracy to defraud the United States and simultaneously entered a deferred prosecution agreement under which Boeing agreed to pay more than $2.5 billion. A deferred prosecution agreement suspends prosecution and is not a conviction.The charge reflects the government's allegations as admitted only in the agreement's statement of facts; it is not a jury verdict or conviction.DOJ Criminal Division case record - United States v. The Boeing CompanyDOJ press release - Boeing Charged with 737 Max Fraud Conspiracy and Agrees to Pay over $2.5 BillionOversight.gov entry - Boeing 737 MAX fraud conspiracy resolutionCourtListener docket - United States v. The Boeing Company, 4:21-cr-00005 (N.D. Tex.)
- audit report / official#DOT OIG reports FAA certification and delegation weaknessesDOT OIG found weaknesses in FAA's certification guidance and its risk-based oversight of Boeing's delegated authority, including that FAA lacked a complete understanding of Boeing's MCAS safety assessments until after the first crash. FAA concurred with 14 recommendations.An independent audit finding; it is not a determination of criminal or civil liability.
- audit report / official#DOT OIG closes the 737 MAX return-to-service review and finds the risk-assessment process weakThe third DOT OIG report in the 737 MAX series concluded that FAA's post-accident steps were in line with its own risk assessment processes, while finding those processes allow significant flexibility, rest on guidance not updated in over a decade, lack sufficient human factors data, and are applied with inconsistent engineer training. During recertification FAA retained regulatory compliance findings for the design changes rather than delegating them to Boeing's Organization Designation Authorization program. FAA concurred with all seven recommendations.An independent audit finding; it is not a determination of criminal or civil liability. A concurrence records an agency agreeing to act, not evidence that it has acted.
Public sources ready to ingest
Import sources create source-run packets, document inventories, and review tokens. They do not publish accusations or graph relationships until the case-file evidence rules are satisfied.
Source anchors
The Department of Justice's official running case record for the 737 MAX criminal fraud matter, listing each procedural milestone and linking the underlying court documents (deferred prosecution agreement, criminal information, court orders, non-prosecution agreement, and dismissal order).
Primary DOJ case record; treat as the authoritative procedural timeline. The page blocks automated fetch and was verified by rendered retrieval. Do not read a charge, agreement, breach finding, or dismissal as a conviction.official recordDOJ press release - Boeing Charged with 737 Max Fraud Conspiracy and Agrees to Pay over $2.5 BillionU.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public AffairsDOJ's January 2021 announcement of the deferred prosecution agreement, the single conspiracy charge, and the monetary terms, describing the conduct Boeing admitted concerning the FAA Aircraft Evaluation Group and the MCAS flight-control feature.
Primary DOJ record (archived). A deferred prosecution agreement is a negotiated resolution, not a conviction; the admitted conduct is limited to the agreement's statement of facts.public record repositoryOversight.gov entry - Boeing 737 MAX fraud conspiracy resolutionCouncil of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (Oversight.gov)The federal inspectors-general community repository entry recording the January 2021 DOJ and DOT Inspector General announcement of the 737 MAX fraud resolution.
Official government oversight repository; corroborates the DOJ press release and records DOT-OIG's investigative role. Secondary to the DOJ original but itself an authoritative government record.oversight reportNTSB press release - Alaska Airlines flight 1282 probable causeNational Transportation Safety BoardNTSB's announcement of the adopted probable cause for the January 2024 in-flight door-plug separation, identifying Boeing manufacturing-process failures and ineffective FAA oversight.
Primary NTSB record of the Board's adopted findings. By statute NTSB findings are safety determinations and are not intended to establish legal liability.official recordNTSB investigation page - DCA24MA063 (Alaska Airlines flight 1282)National Transportation Safety BoardThe NTSB investigation landing page recording the accident particulars, injury summary, current status, and links to the investigation docket and final report.
Primary NTSB investigation record and the authoritative index to the case docket documents.official recordNTSB final aviation investigation report AIR-25-04 (Alaska Airlines flight 1282)National Transportation Safety BoardThe full adopted NTSB final report on the door-plug separation, containing the factual record, analysis, probable cause, findings, and safety recommendations.
Primary NTSB document. The PDF was confirmed to resolve; its probable-cause and factual content are corroborated by the NTSB press release and investigation page. Extract the verbatim probable-cause statement and recommendation numbers from the PDF text before quoting them.official recordFAA newsroom - Updates on Boeing 737-9 MAX Aircraft (Boeing oversight actions)Federal Aviation AdministrationFAA's consolidated public log of its regulatory and enforcement actions on the 737-9 and 737 MAX following the January 5, 2024 door-plug event.
Primary FAA record; blocks automated fetch and was verified by rendered retrieval. The page states a halt on production expansion without a numeric per-month cap.audit reportDOT OIG Report AV2021020 - Weaknesses in FAA's Certification and Delegation Processes Hindered Its Oversight of the 737 MAX 8U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector GeneralDOT OIG audit of FAA's certification of the 737 MAX 8 and its oversight of Boeing's Organization Designation Authorization, finding guidance and process weaknesses around MCAS and delegated authority.
Primary DOT OIG audit report; audit findings are oversight conclusions, not criminal-liability determinations.audit reportDOT OIG Report AV2023025 - FAA Has Completed 737 MAX Return to Service Efforts, but Opportunities Exist To Improve the Agency's Risk Assessments and Certification ProcessesU.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Inspector GeneralThe third DOT OIG report in the 737 MAX series, reviewing FAA's post-accident risk assessments and its recertification and return-to-service work, and finding that FAA's steps were in line with its own processes while identifying weaknesses in the guidance, data and training behind them.
Primary DOT OIG audit report; the library item and the full-report PDF both resolve to this desk's identifying client. Audit findings are oversight conclusions, not criminal-liability determinations, and a concurrence is an agency agreeing to act rather than evidence it has acted.baselineWhat the record currently supports
Claim rows are derived from timeline events and source anchors. They are evidence-status labels, not accusations or final truth claims.
What should be released next
Release requests are lawful public-record asks. They identify source gaps, review gates, and privacy constraints; they are not evidence that a specific person committed wrongdoing.
What stays unresolved
Deliberate gaps in the public record — open until the underlying records are released or reviewed, not questions we have skipped.
- Filed
- Hugin · public social evidence reports
- License
- Text and data are shared under the terms noted at hugin.studio/support · attribution appreciated.
- Fingerprint
9D91 2C89 337A
For researchers & contributorsSource desk, research joins & machine-readable exportsEverything Hugin uses to grow and audit this file — connection detail, review posture, scout queue, and every export.
Every machine-readable slice of this file
How the public record is joined
Connections are navigation aids. They show where a record, event, or role is sourced; they do not convert association, correspondence, testimony requests, or document appearance into misconduct findings.
Scout queue before promotion
Default public-record source desk for cases without a hand-tuned scout profile.
Source leads and automated probes are review inventory. They become verified anchors only after Hugin can attach the public record, legal posture, and no-allegation guardrails.
Public-record joins are wired into exports
These are not loose TODOs anymore. Each lane below is computed from the case file's source tiers, then joined to matching sources, timeline events, role nodes, and release-roadmap requests.
Retrieve the January 2024 Emergency Airworthiness Directive and the ACSAA Section 103 expert-review-panel report, and confirm whether the production limit carried a specific per-month figure and whether it remains in force.
Extract the verbatim probable-cause statement and the full safety-recommendation list from the AIR-25-04 PDF or the NTSB docket abstract.
Fetch the justice.gov-hosted deferred prosecution agreement, criminal information, December 5, 2024 rejection opinion, May 29, 2025 non-prosecution agreement, and November 6, 2025 dismissal order (and the govinfo USCOURTS docket set), since justice.gov blocks automated fetch.
Monitor the Fifth Circuit docket and the DOJ case page for the ruling on the pending petition for rehearing en banc.
Fetch the House 238-page report PDF and the Senate Commerce report PDF, and locate the 2024 Senate hearing records on Boeing's safety culture.
Locate and fetch the separate court docket and disposition for any former Boeing 737 MAX technical pilot before naming an individual.
Fetch the July 2024 proposed plea agreement and reconcile any dollar figures and monitor terms against the filed document; mark any figure not in the document as secondary.
Help grow the source queue
Hugin accepts public records, not accusations. A submitted URL lands in a review lane, gets source-validated, and only becomes a case anchor after the evidence rules and privacy gates are satisfied.
What this case can prove right now
Fact-check status is a review posture, not a verdict. Source-scout rows are leads until a reviewer joins them to publishable anchors; claim-ledger rows are timeline-derived and still require source validation plus no-allegation guardrails before promotion.
Queue a public record
Paste an official or public-record URL. Hugin classifies the lane first, keeps lead-only material quarantined, and requires source validation before anything reaches the case file.
Queue a public source for review.Latest submitted public URLs
Sanitized queue view: Hugin shows the public URL, lane, status, and why a source has not been promoted. Submitter identifiers are not shown.
Submit sources, not claims
A source is a public URL someone else can inspect. A claim is an interpretation. Hugin queues sources first and keeps claims out until a reviewed public record supports the exact wording.
Official agency pages, court dockets, congressional releases, civil records, state updates, and public repositories with source URLs.
Publisher, date, record family, and why the URL belongs in this file.
Source URLs first. Context is welcome, but claims do not publish from submissions alone.
Private tips, survivor identifiers, sealed or leaked material, graphic details, and private contact data.
Screenshots or social posts without a public source URL.
Misconduct labels for living people unless the exact cited public record supports that exact statement.
Case change ledger
Audit feed for source anchors, queue decisions, privacy-review jobs, and hashes. It explains the process without turning leads into claims.
CourtListener docket - United States v. The Boeing Company, 4:21-cr-00005 (N.D. Tex.)
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.6b799919fde1CRS In Focus IF12843 - Federal Aviation Administration Oversight of Boeing
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.5011f12ddda3House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee - Final Committee Report on the Boeing 737 MAX
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.f0e9f6588eb0Oversight.gov entry - Boeing 737 MAX fraud conspiracy resolution
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.c9898ca8b563Senate Commerce Committee - Wicker releases the Committee's FAA investigation report
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.79093266a6f4Case file hash snapshot
- Status
- hash changed when case bundle changes
- Evidence state
- metadata only
Mirrors can compare this hash to verify the same case file bundle.
Next: Compare the short hash in the UI with this machine-readable ledger.9d912c89337aDocument manifest hash snapshot
- Status
- hash changed when document handling changes
- Evidence state
- metadata only
This binds document mirroring and privacy-triage rules.
Next: Compare the short hash in the UI with this machine-readable ledger.0720c16b26d4Document review queue hash snapshot
- Status
- hash changed when document jobs change
- Evidence state
- metadata only
This binds privacy-review and metadata extraction jobs.
Next: Compare the short hash in the UI with this machine-readable ledger.1a27cb84cf53Source validation hash snapshot
- Status
- hash changed when queue or validation rules change
- Evidence state
- metadata only
This binds the visible queue decisions to a machine-readable report.
Next: Compare the short hash in the UI with this machine-readable ledger.d51f1bbe9c58Submission queue hash snapshot
- Status
- hash changed when public queue rows change
- Evidence state
- metadata only
This changes when sanitized submission rows change.
Next: Compare the short hash in the UI with this machine-readable ledger.3b1a7a16a094