Official CFPB database of consumer financial product and service complaints, with browser exploration, exports, and API access.

E85B7FEDPublic record case file · Updated Oct 2, 2026
Consumer Protection Enforcement
Accountability file
A public-record case file for tracking data-broker, privacy, consumer-finance, civil enforcement, complaint-data, retail-fraud, recall, breach, communications-enforcement, and healthcare-transparency source lanes. It treats enforcement actions, warning letters, complaint databases, recall records, breach lists, and investor-protection programs as separate public records rather than proof that any named company or person committed misconduct outside the cited record.
Original editorial artwork generated for Hugin.
- Updated
- Oct 2, 2026
- Source Anchors
- 82 verified · 254 leads
- Timeline
- 51 events
- Roles
- 12 public-record
- Fingerprint
E85B 7FED AAAE
Saved reading0In this browser
Keep roles, events, and source records here to pick up later. Your list stays in this browser and can be lost if you clear site data. Copy your saved links to keep a backup in your notes.
Your reading list is empty. Use a save button on an event, source, or role dossier to add it here.
Start reading
51 events · 12 roles · 82 sourcesRecent developments in the record
The latest dated events in this file. Open an event for its cited sources and evidence limits.
- CPSC sets a virtual hearing for oral comments on its micromobility battery rule, four months after the proposal printed →records release · 2 source records
Read summary and limits
A procedural notice (FR Doc. 2026-20296) went on Federal Register public inspection and is scheduled to print October 5. It opens a virtual hearing at 10 a.m. Eastern on October 21 for oral comments on the lithium-ion battery proposal the Commission printed in June, an opportunity section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act requires it to offer; requests to present, with the written text of the presentation, and pre-registration are due by 5 p.m. Eastern on October 15, and each presentation is limited to five minutes. The Commission voted 3-0 to publish the notice and says it received requests to present, without saying how many. The notice carries no rule text, no list of covered products and no incident figures: it is a hearing announcement, not a new or revised proposal. The June proposal had set its own deadline for requests to present at July 24; this notice sets a later one, and this desk records both rather than reconciling them.
Evidence limits. Public inspection is not publication, and a hearing notice proposes nothing; the substantive rule remains a proposal that binds no one.
- Southern Glazer's settles the FTC's Robinson-Patman case: a six-year order on 'paired' wine and spirits sales, with a monitor and no admission →civil settlement · 2 source records
Read summary and limits
The FTC announced a proposed stipulated consent decree, filed the same day in the Central District of California, resolving the price-discrimination suit it brought against Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits LLC in December 2024 - the Commission's first Robinson-Patman enforcement action in a generation, by its own description. The order targets 'paired' transactions in which Southern Glazer's sells a product to a chain retailer while contemporaneously selling the same product to a nearby independent retailer at a significantly higher price. Once $5,000 of aggregated excess payments to one covered retailer accumulate within a 12-month reporting period, the company may cure by paying that retailer 1.5 times the full differential within 60 days of notice, and must pay twice the differential if it declines to cure and the Commission then prevails in an enforcement action. A Commission-appointed, jointly selected monitor oversees compliance; the order covers the five largest chain retailers in 26 states, expires six years after entry, and records that the company denies the allegations. The Commission vote was 2-0.
Evidence limits. A settlement of allegations, in force only once the judge signs it; the order states it is not evidence against the company or an admission of liability, and that a cure payment is not an admission either.
- FTC, Nevada and Utah sue Lens.com, alleging a hidden 'Taxes & fees' charge routinely doubled the advertised price of contact lenses →charge · 2 source records
Read summary and limits
The Commission, the State of Nevada and the Utah Division of Consumer Protection filed a civil complaint in the District of Nevada against Lens.com, Inc., its affiliate Speed Commerce, LLC and Cary Samourkachian, pleaded as sole owner of both. It alleges the companies advertise low per-box prices in Google search ads and on lens.com, then add a mandatory 'Taxes & fees' line item below the viewable part of an interim checkout screen, so a consumer who clicks a prominent 'Continue' button never sees it; in a February 2026 example the complaint pleads a $146.32 advertised eight-box order that came to a $649.71 charge after a $273.44 'Taxes & fees' amount and $9.95 shipping. It alleges the label is misleading because many states exempt contact lenses from sales tax or levy none, that the same prices were used to enroll consumers in the 'AutoRefill' negative-option plan without clearly disclosing that charge, the renewal date, the total cost or how to cancel, and that the practices continued after the Commission's August 2025 Civil Investigative Demand. Counts are pleaded under Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, Section 4 of ROSCA, Section 521 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and three state statutes; the plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction and monetary relief, with civil penalties sought by the states. The Commission vote was 2-0.
Evidence limits. A civil complaint is a set of allegations no court has weighed; no defendant has answered in the records this desk read, and the 'hundreds of millions of dollars' in the release is pleaded in the aggregate, not audited.
Read the case scope: what is included and excluded
Included in this file
- FTC consumer-protection, privacy, data-broker, warning-letter, settlement, and legal-library records.
- CFPB consumer complaint, enforcement-action, and public-data inventory records.
- DOJ Civil Division and fraud-section enforcement records when they concern consumer, contractor, or financial harm.
- SEC retail-fraud, litigation-release, and harmed-investor public records as market-adjacent consumer protection context.
- Federal recall and product-safety records from Recalls.gov, CPSC, NHTSA, FDA, and openFDA.
- HHS OCR breach portal records and CMS Open Payments records when they help users distinguish public accountability data from private or non-adjudicated facts.
- FCC enforcement-action records for communications, robocall, accessibility, pirate-radio, and consumer-communications posture review.
- A review queue that separates official enforcement posture, complaint-data limits, and source-desk leads before any promotion copy.
Outside this file’s scope
- Calling a company, person, broker, lender, adviser, or platform fraudulent from a complaint row, warning letter, or settlement headline alone.
- Treating recall rows, breach-list rows, or Open Payments rows as liability findings, product-defect admissions, clinical advice, or conflict-of-interest conclusions without the cited legal record.
- Publishing consumer complaint narratives in ways that expose private people, account details, medical/financial identifiers, or location data.
- Turning agency priorities, working groups, or public dashboards into guilt findings.
What remains unresolved
These questions stay open in the case file.
- Which FTC records are warning letters, complaints, proposed orders, final orders, settlements, guidance, or topic indexes?
- Which CFPB complaint-data rows can be used only as aggregate review context with the database caveats attached?
How the public record connects
- Subject
- Person or role
- Event
This view starts with the roles that have the most source-record links in this file. Explore Role Web and Timeline for the full set. A line represents a shared source record; it does not establish conduct or a direct relationship.
Publishing limits
These are the standards every anchor on this file must clear.
- Minimum source tier
- official record
- civil enforcement record
- state enforcement record
- public record repository
- coverage index
- Living people
- For living people, publish only source-backed roles, legal posture, and exact record relationships; do not infer intent or liability.
- Victim protection
- Do not expose private consumer narratives, account details, medical/financial identifiers, precise location data, or personal complaint details unless an official record makes narrow quotation necessary.
- Social leads
- Social posts can point to a source queue, but consumer-protection claims require official agency, court, complaint-data, or enforcement records.
No guilt by proximity
A company, adviser, broker, lender, platform, or data broker appearing in a complaint database, warning letter, or enforcement index is a public-record relationship only.
People, institutions, and the records between them
Every public-record role in this file, grouped by kind. Open a role to read its dossier — its public-record status, what it is, and the source records behind it. A shared record linking two roles is not a finding about conduct beyond that record.
12 roles linked to 20 of 82 source records. 0 records connect more than one role. Open a role to follow its records into the timeline.
Hover or tap a role to light up the records that name it, then choose a partner to see exactly which records connect the two. Tap again, or use Open dossier, to read it. Watch it form replays the file by publication date.
- Role — size follows its records; the outer arc is the share it holds in common
- A record naming only that role
- A record naming two or more roles, threaded to each
A thread is a source record, not a relationship. Two roles meet only where one paper names both.
12 of 12 roles · Counts describe records in this file.
Courts & prosecutors 11
- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Federally-facilitated Exchangesagency · official record holder
Runs the federal health insurance Marketplace at HealthCare.gov and registers the agents and brokers who enroll consumers in it.
1 source record · 1 linked eventRead role → - Consumer Financial Protection Bureauagency · civil enforcement authority
Publishes consumer financial complaint data and enforcement-action records.
2 source records · 1 linked eventRead role → - DOJ Civil Divisionagency · civil enforcement authority
Publishes civil enforcement and fraud press records that can anchor consumer-protection and contractor-fraud review.
3 source records · 3 linked eventsRead role → - FCC Enforcement Bureauagency · civil enforcement authority
Publishes communications-enforcement orders, notices, forfeiture orders, and consent decrees.
1 source record · 1 linked eventRead role → - FDA recall and openFDA enforcement data laneagency · public record repository
Publishes FDA-regulated product recall pages and openFDA enforcement report APIs.
2 source records · 1 linked eventRead role → - Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Consumer Protectionagency · civil enforcement authority
Publishes consumer-protection, privacy, data-broker, warning-letter, settlement, and legal-library records.
3 source records · 3 linked eventsRead role → - HHS Office for Civil Rights breach portalagency · public record repository
Publishes public breach portal rows for unsecured protected health information affecting 500 or more individuals.
1 source record · 1 linked eventRead role → - National Highway Traffic Safety Administrationagency · public record repository
Publishes vehicle, tire, car-seat, and equipment recall and safety-complaint records.
1 source record · 1 linked eventRead role → - SEC Division of Enforcement retail-fraud laneagency · civil enforcement authority
Publishes retail-fraud program records and litigation releases for investor-protection review.
2 source records · 2 linked eventsRead role → - U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commissionagency · civil enforcement authority
Brings civil enforcement actions over commodity, futures, and retail foreign-currency fraud, including pool schemes sold to the public.
1 source record · 1 linked eventRead role → - U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commissionagency · public record repository
Publishes consumer product recall records and machine-readable recall API data.
2 source records · 1 linked eventRead role →
Records & law 1
No single record names more than one role in this file yet.
Official CFPB enforcement-action portal with court documents and related materials for Bureau actions.
The CFTC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida against Cash FX Group S.A. and its CEO, The Conversion Pros, Inc. and its CEO, and one other individual. The complaint alleges they ran a multilevel marketing Ponzi scheme that took in over $950 million from the public for purported retail foreign-currency trading in a commodity pool, and that participants lost at least $406 million.
CMS Open Payments data portal and API for publicly accessible payment, ownership, and transfer-of-value records reported by drug and medical-device companies.
CPSC page documenting REST access to machine-readable recall data for publicly available product recall information visible on cpsc.gov.
DOJ record announcing coordinated non-prosecution agreements with Alibaba and AUS Merchant Services that resolve defined FDCA-related marketplace and payment-processing conduct with $600 million in combined penalties and forfeitures.
Timeline
Follow the record as it develops. Start with the latest events, or read from the beginning.
51 recorded events · Feb 9, 2026 — Oct 2, 2026
Showing 1–12 of 51 events · Latest first
- Records releaseOfficial record
CPSC sets a virtual hearing for oral comments on its micromobility battery rule, four months after the proposal printed
A procedural notice (FR Doc. 2026-20296) went on Federal Register public inspection and is scheduled to print October 5. It opens a virtual hearing at 10 a.m. Eastern on October 21 for oral comments on the lithium-ion battery proposal the Commission printed in June, an opportunity section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act requires it to offer; requests to present, with the written text of the presentation, and pre-registration are due by 5 p.m. Eastern on October 15, and each presentation is limited to five minutes. The Commission voted 3-0 to publish the notice and says it received requests to present, without saying how many. The notice carries no rule text, no list of covered products and no incident figures: it is a hearing announcement, not a new or revised proposal. The June proposal had set its own deadline for requests to present at July 24; this notice sets a later one, and this desk records both rather than reconciling them.
2 cited source records
- CPSC proposed rule: Safety Standard for Lithium-Ion Batteries Used in Micromobility Products and Electrical Systems of Micromobility Products Containing Such Batteries (Docket CPSC-2025-0012, RIN 3041-AE10, FR Doc. 2026-12749, 91 FR 38162) U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission / Federal Register · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- Federal Register public inspection: CPSC, announcement of opportunity for oral presentation of comments on the micromobility lithium-ion battery NPRM (FR Doc. 2026-20296) U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (Federal Register public-inspection copy) · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- Civil settlementOfficial record
Southern Glazer's settles the FTC's Robinson-Patman case: a six-year order on 'paired' wine and spirits sales, with a monitor and no admission
The FTC announced a proposed stipulated consent decree, filed the same day in the Central District of California, resolving the price-discrimination suit it brought against Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits LLC in December 2024 - the Commission's first Robinson-Patman enforcement action in a generation, by its own description. The order targets 'paired' transactions in which Southern Glazer's sells a product to a chain retailer while contemporaneously selling the same product to a nearby independent retailer at a significantly higher price. Once $5,000 of aggregated excess payments to one covered retailer accumulate within a 12-month reporting period, the company may cure by paying that retailer 1.5 times the full differential within 60 days of notice, and must pay twice the differential if it declines to cure and the Commission then prevails in an enforcement action. A Commission-appointed, jointly selected monitor oversees compliance; the order covers the five largest chain retailers in 26 states, expires six years after entry, and records that the company denies the allegations. The Commission vote was 2-0.
2 cited source records
- FTC Secures Settlement that Protects Small Businesses from Illegal Price Discrimination Federal Trade Commission · civil enforcement recordRead source summary and connections →
- Federal Trade Commission v. Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits, LLC, No. 8:24-cv-02684-FWS-ADS (C.D. Cal.): [proposed] stipulated consent decree and order (Doc. 231-1) Federal Trade Commission (filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California) · court docketRead source summary and connections →
- Records releaseOfficial record
FTC's notice on platform ad tools and impersonation scams goes on Federal Register public inspection, scheduled to print October 1
The FTC's advance notice of proposed rulemaking on platforms' ad-optimization services and impersonation scams (FR Doc. 2026-20143, RIN 3084-AB90) was filed for public inspection and is scheduled for Federal Register publication on October 1. Comments are due 60 days after publication, a date the printed notice will fix; counted from an October 1 printing, that is November 30. Online comments go through Regulations.gov, marked '16 CFR Part 461--Impersonation Rule, Matter No. R207000'. The notice asks questions and contains no rule text; it says any provision it considers 'will focus on ad-optimization practices by digital marketplace platforms', narrower than the means-and-instrumentalities provision the Commission set aside in December 2024.
2 cited source records
- FTC release: comment sought on updating the Impersonation Rule to address platforms' ad-optimization role in impersonation scams (ANPRM) Federal Trade Commission · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- Federal Register public inspection: FTC, Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businesses, advance notice of proposed rulemaking (FR Doc. 2026-20143) Federal Trade Commission (Federal Register public-inspection copy) · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- ChargeOfficial record
SEC sues Meyer Global Management and its CEO, alleging at least $1.27 million misappropriated from private funds meant to hold SpaceX and other pre-IPO shares
The SEC filed a civil complaint in the Southern District of New York against Meyer Global Management LLC and its CEO, Owen E.H. Meyer. It alleges they raised at least $18.5 million from nearly 100 investors in about 16 funds meant to hold SpaceX, OpenAI and other pre-IPO interests, and in five schemes since December 2021 breached their fiduciary duties: misappropriating at least $1,270,000 in three of them, diverting $686,636 of a receiver's wire meant for investors, about $636,406 of it to Meyer's personal account, and letting a SpaceX fund forfeit its stake over an unpaid capital call, then telling its investors to 'stay tuned' for share distributions. The SEC seeks injunctions, disgorgement, civil penalties and a bar on Meyer associating with any broker, dealer or investment adviser, and demands a jury trial.
2 cited source records
- SEC press release 2026-98: SEC Charges Meyer Global Management and Its CEO With Defrauding Retail Investors in Private Funds That Held Interests in SpaceX and Other Pre-IPO Securities U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · civil enforcement recordRead source summary and connections →
- SEC v. Meyer Global Management LLC and Owen E. H. Meyer, No. 1:26-cv-08607 (S.D.N.Y.): complaint (ECF 1) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York) · court docketRead source summary and connections →
- Civil settlementOfficial record
Corteva settles the FTC and 12 states' pesticide loyalty case: a 10-year ban on share-based terms and $35 million to the states
The FTC announced a proposed stipulated order, filed September 25, resolving its and 12 states' 2022 claims that Corteva's post-patent loyalty program paid distributors to block competitors from selling cheaper generic pesticides to farmers. For 10 years the order would bar Corteva from conditioning distributor payments on buying more than 50% of an active ingredient from it, from capping generic purchases, and from related exclusionary terms, across all its post-patent active ingredients. Corteva would pay the state plaintiffs $35 million and does not admit the allegations. The Commission vote was 2-0, and the case against Syngenta continues.
2 cited source records
- FTC, States Win Protections to Lower Pesticide Prices for American Farmers in Antitrust Case Against Corteva Federal Trade Commission · civil enforcement recordRead source summary and connections →
- Hugin desk: the Corteva pesticide loyalty-rebate settlement Hugin · public record repositoryRead source summary and connections →
- Records releaseOfficial record
Ford's F-150 fuel-tank recall covers 223,472 trucks; the mailed owner letter is now on NHTSA's file
Ford's recall 26V578 (26S69) covers certain 2023-2027 F-150s whose fuel tank may be improperly secured and leak fuel or detach while driving, creating a road hazard and a risk of stall or fire. It reaches only trucks that were unsold or had less than three months in service on August 27. Dealers will inspect and replace the tank straps as needed at no charge. Owner letters were mailed September 21, and NHTSA posted the mailed remedy letter on September 27.
2 cited source records
- NHTSA Recall 26V578 (Ford 26S69): 2023-2027 F-150 fuel tank may leak or detach National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (recall record and Ford filings) · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- Hugin desk: Ford's 223,472-truck F-150 fuel-tank strap recall Hugin · public record repositoryRead source summary and connections →
- Records releaseOfficial record
Mercedes rollaway recall of 310,667 vehicles: NHTSA posts both a 'remedy not yet available' letter and a 'remedy now available' letter
Mercedes-Benz USA's recall 26V481 covers certain 2019-2026 A-Class, C-Class, CLA, CLE, GLA, GLB and GLC vehicles whose driver door-lock micro-switch may corrode and fail to detect an open door, so the electronic parking brake or Auto-Park may not engage and the vehicle may roll away. Dealers will replace the lock at no charge. On September 27 NHTSA posted two mailed owner letters, both dated September 18: an interim letter saying the remedy is not yet available and a remedy letter saying it is. The only parts release this desk found in the file, a September 11 notice to dealers, covers 3,504 vehicles.
2 cited source records
- NHTSA Recall 26V481 (Mercedes-Benz USA): rollaway risk from driver door-lock micro-switch National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (recall record and Mercedes-Benz USA filings) · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- Hugin desk: the two Mercedes rollaway owner letters dated September 18 Hugin · public record repositoryRead source summary and connections →
- Records release reviewOfficial record
CFTC sues Cash FX and others over an alleged $950 million retail forex MLM scheme
The CFTC announced a complaint, filed the day before in the Middle District of Florida, alleging Cash FX Group and related defendants ran a multilevel-marketing Ponzi scheme. The complaint says they took in over $950 million for purported forex pool trading with promised weekly returns of up to 15%, and that participants lost at least $406 million.
2 cited source records
- CFTC release 9304-26: complaint against Cash FX Group S.A. and others over an alleged $950 million forex multilevel-marketing Ponzi scheme U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission · civil enforcement recordRead source summary and connections →
- Hugin desk: the CFTC's complaint over Cash FX's 'AI' forex pool Hugin · public record repositoryRead source summary and connections →
Explore 1 role connected through these sources
These links follow shared source records; they do not imply conduct or a direct relationship.
- ChargeOfficial record
Prosecutors announce wire-fraud and money-laundering charges against AKL Transport's founder, with totals that differ from the SEC's
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Florida announced an indictment charging Kristopher Lunsford with six counts of wire fraud and two of money laundering over semi-truck lease investments that promised weekly payouts, and seeking forfeiture of $105,940,214.93. The indictment was returned September 23, the day before the SEC filed its settled civil action. It alleges more than $105 million was solicited between about December 2023 and May 2025, about $75 million went to pay earlier investors, over $25 million to personal enrichment and about $2 million to business operations. The SEC's action reports different totals over a different period, and neither agency explains the gap.
3 cited source records
- SEC Litigation Release No. 26648: SEC v. Kristopher A. Lunsford, AKL Transport LLC, and Southern Truck Leasing LLC, No. 8:26-cv-02923 (M.D. Fla.) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission · civil enforcement recordRead source summary and connections →
- Owner of Semi-truck Business Indicted for Operating $105 Million Fraud Scheme U.S. Attorney's Office, Middle District of Florida (DOJ) · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- Hugin desk: the AKL Transport indictment and SEC action, and their two totals Hugin · public record repositoryRead source summary and connections →
- SentenceOfficial record
Eleven sentenced in a Hampton Roads scheme that took credit union members' phones to reach their accounts
The Eastern District of Virginia announced that all eleven defendants in a scheme that, since at least January 2023, used deceit and intimidation in public places to obtain credit union members' mobile devices and then made unauthorized loan applications, disputes, transfers and withdrawals have been sentenced. Seven pleaded guilty to wire-fraud offenses and four to money-laundering conspiracy; sentences range from four months to three years and six months, the last imposed September 24.
2 cited source records
- Eleven defendants sentenced to prison in Hampton Roads credit union parking lot scam U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Virginia (DOJ) · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- Hugin desk: the Hampton Roads credit union parking-lot scam sentences Hugin · public record repositoryRead source summary and connections →
- Records releaseOfficial record
CPSC's September 24 recalls include five products above 20,000 units
Of the eleven recalls the CPSC recalls API returned for September 24, five exceed 20,000 units. They are about 51,000 reclining-chair battery packs (four overheating reports), about 48,405 mattresses that violate the flammability standard, about 43,674 light-up toys with accessible button batteries, about 25,073 dressers that violate the STURDY Act tip-over standard, and about 21,380 power banks with nine explosion or ignition reports including one $2 million fire. Remedies range from refunds and replacements to retrofit kits.
6 cited source records
- CPSC recall 26-791: The Blue Cactus Company reclining chair battery packs U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- CPSC recall 26-788: ZCK01 Kesyup mattresses (mandatory flammability standard) U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- CPSC recall 26-799: ABC Trading light-up children's toys (button cell battery access) U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- CPSC recall 26-792: NEWDERY power banks (model ZHX-PB22) U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- CPSC recall 26-794: Aitjunz 8-drawer dressers (STURDY Act standard) U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission · official recordRead source summary and connections →
- Hugin desk: the CPSC's eleven September 24 recalls and the window-cord proposal Hugin · public record repositoryRead source summary and connections →
Source records
Read the records behind this file. Search titles, publishers, summaries, and extracted facts. Each source keeps its reading limits and links to the events and roles it supports.
Showing 1–10 of 82 sources · 82 in this file
Federal Register public inspection: CPSC, announcement of opportunity for oral presentation of comments on the micromobility lithium-ion battery NPRM (FR Doc. 2026-20296)
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (Federal Register public-inspection copy)
A procedural notice, filed for public inspection October 2, 2026 at 8:45 a.m. Eastern and scheduled to print October 5, setting a virtual CPSC hearing for oral comments on the already-published micromobility lithium-ion battery NPRM. The hearing is at 10 a.m. Eastern on October 21, 2026; requests to present, with the written text of the presentation, and pre-registration are due by 5 p.m. Eastern on October 15, 2026; each presentation is limited to five minutes. The notice says section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act requires the Commission to offer an opportunity for oral presentation, that it received requests to present, and that oral comments become part of the rulemaking record.
7 extracted facts
- Its action line reads: 'ACTION: Announcement of opportunity for oral presentation of comments.'
- It states: 'The virtual meeting will begin at 10 a.m. Eastern time on October 21, 2026.'
- It states: 'Request must be received no later than 5 p.m. Eastern time on October 15, 2026.'
- Its background states: 'On June 24, 2026, the Commission published an NPRM in the Federal Register, proposing to issue a safety standard for lithium-ion batteries used in micromobility products under the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA; 15 U.S.C. 2051-2089), and seeking written comments. 91 FR 38162.'
- It states: 'The Commission received requests to present and is providing this forum. Each oral presentation will be limited to 5 minutes, excluding time for questioning by the Commissioners or CPSC staff.'
- Its footnote reads: 'The Commission voted 3-0 to publish this notification.'
- Its filing line reads: '[FR Doc. 2026-20296 Filed: 10/2/2026 8:45 am; Publication Date: 10/5/2026]'.
1 timeline event cites this source
Federal Trade Commission v. Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits, LLC, No. 8:24-cv-02684-FWS-ADS (C.D. Cal.): [proposed] stipulated consent decree and order (Doc. 231-1)
Federal Trade Commission (filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California)
The 28-page proposed stipulated consent decree filed October 2, 2026 before Judge Fred W. Slaughter. It recites that the Commission sued under Section 2 of the Clayton Act as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act and Section 5 of the FTC Act, and that the defendant denies the allegations. It defines an 'Enforcement Threshold' of $5,000 in aggregated Excess Payments from discriminatory paired transactions with one covered retailer in any 12-month reporting period, gives the defendant a cure option of 1.5 times the full Excess Payment within 60 days of notice, provides for two times that amount if the Commission prevails in an enforcement action after the defendant declines to cure, has the Commission appoint a jointly selected monitor after entry, lists 26 relevant states, and expires six years after entry.
8 extracted facts
- It records: 'The Complaint alleges that Defendant violated Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. 13, and Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 45, by selling wine and spirits to disfavored independent retailers at higher prices than it charges large, favored chain retailers... Defendant denies the allegations in the Complaint.'
- It states: 'This Order does not constitute any evidence against Defendant, or an admission of liability or wrongdoing by Defendant.'
- It defines: "'Enforcement Threshold' means $5,000 in aggregated Excess Payments from all Discriminatory Paired Transactions involving a particular Covered Retailer within any 12-month reporting period."
- It provides: 'Defendant may cure the set of identified Discriminatory Paired Transactions by paying the Covered Retailer 1.5 times the full Excess Payment for each and all of the Discriminatory Paired Transactions that compose the alleged Order violation within 60 days of receiving notice (the "Cure Payment").'
- It provides: 'If the Commission prevails in an Order enforcement action, Defendant shall pay the Covered Retailer two times the full Excess Payment for each of the Discriminatory Paired Transactions that compose the Order violation.'
- It states: 'At any time after this Order is entered, the Commission shall appoint a Monitor to ensure that Defendant expeditiously complies with all of its obligations... The Commission and Defendant shall jointly select the Monitor.'
- It states: 'IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order shall expire 6 years after the date it is entered.'
- Its stipulation reads: 'Defendant stipulates that it shall comply with the provisions of this Order pending its entry by the Court.'
1 timeline event cites this source
Federal Trade Commission, State of Nevada and Utah Division of Consumer Protection v. Lens.com, Inc., Speed Commerce, LLC and Cary Samourkachian, No. 2:26-cv-03232 (D. Nev.): complaint
Federal Trade Commission (filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada)
The complaint for permanent injunction, monetary judgments, civil penalty judgments and other relief, filed October 2, 2026. It pleads counts under Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, Section 4 of ROSCA and Section 521 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, plus Nevada's Deceptive Trade Practices Act and Utah's Consumer Sales Practices Act and Automatic Renewal Contracts Act. Its central allegation is a mandatory 'Taxes & fees' line item placed below the fold of an interim checkout screen; in a February 2026 example it pleads a $146.32 advertised eight-box order that came to a $649.71 charge after a $273.44 'Taxes & fees' amount and $9.95 shipping. It alleges the conduct continued after the Commission's August 2025 Civil Investigative Demand, names Samourkachian as sole owner of both companies, and seeks a permanent injunction and monetary relief, with civil penalties sought by the states.
7 extracted facts
- It alleges a '"Taxes & fees" charge that is hidden and routinely doubles the initially advertised price.'
- Of a February 2026 order summary it states the transaction 'depicted above would have resulted in a $649.71 charge--more than four times the advertised' total.
- Its figure caption transcribes the screen as reading 'Order Total: $649.71; Proclear 1 Day Mail-in Rebate: -$220.00'.
- It alleges the 'hidden "Taxes & fees" charge imposed an additional $273.44 to the total cost.'
- It alleges that 'Defendants have not ceased their unlawful acts or practices since receiving the Commission's Civil Investigative Demand in' August 2025.
- Its opening names the plaintiffs as the Commission, the State of Nevada 'and the Utah Division of Consumer Protection (the "Division"), for their Complaint allege:'.
- It alleges Cary Samourkachian 'is the sole owner, officer, and employee of' Lens.com and is also the manager and sole owner of Speed Commerce.
1 timeline event cites this source
FTC Secures Settlement that Protects Small Businesses from Illegal Price Discrimination
Federal Trade Commission
FTC release dated October 2, 2026 announcing a proposed stipulated order resolving the Commission's 2024 Robinson-Patman Act lawsuit against Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits LLC, the largest U.S. wine and spirits distributor. The release describes limits on charging independent retailers more than competing chains on 'paired' transactions, a $5,000 aggregate threshold over 12 months, cure payments of 1.5 times the price differential and double that if the Commission prevails in an enforcement action, a six-year term, an independent monitor, and coverage of sales to the five largest chain retailers in 26 states. The Commission vote was 2-0 and the order was filed in the Central District of California.
7 extracted facts
- It states: 'The Federal Trade Commission secured a settlement agreement with Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits LLC, the nation's largest distributor of wine and spirits, that will redress allegedly illegal price discrimination practices and make it easier for small businesses to compete against large chain retailers.'
- It states: 'The sweeping settlement covers nearly all Southern wine and spirits sales to the five largest chain retailers in 26 states.'
- It states: "The FTC's settlement with Southern delivers a successful conclusion to the Commission's first enforcement action under the Robinson-Patman Act in a generation."
- It states: 'Where a set of discriminatory paired transactions meets certain specifications, Southern can resolve the violation by paying the independent retailer 1.5 times the full aggregated price-differential amount.'
- It states: "The FTC's proposed stipulated order will remain in effect for six years and will be overseen by an independent monitor."
- It states: 'The Commission vote to issue the proposed stipulated order was 2-0. The order was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.'
- Its page note reads: 'Stipulated orders have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.'
1 timeline event cites this source
Federal Register public inspection: FTC, Rule on Impersonation of Government and Businesses, advance notice of proposed rulemaking (FR Doc. 2026-20143)
Federal Trade Commission (Federal Register public-inspection copy)
The 37-page public-inspection copy of the FTC's advance notice of proposed rulemaking under 16 CFR Part 461 (RIN 3084-AB90), filed for public inspection September 30, 2026 at 8:45 a.m. Eastern and scheduled to be published in the Federal Register October 1. It asks whether to amend the Impersonation Rule, write a new rule, or use alternatives over search, social media and other digital marketplace platforms whose ad-optimization services it says further government and business impersonation scams. It contains no rule text.
6 extracted facts
- Its header reads: 'This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 2026-10-01'.
- It states the Commission 'proposes to commence a rulemaking proceeding to prevent certain unfair or deceptive acts or practices by search engine, social media, and other digital marketplace platforms that further government and business impersonation scams to defraud consumers.'
- It states: 'Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].'
- It states any means-and-instrumentalities provision the Commission considers 'will focus on ad-optimization practices by digital marketplace platforms and will therefore necessarily be narrower than the 2024 SNPRM's proposed provision'.
- It asks: 'Should the requirement trigger liability only if the Platform has some level of knowledge of, or participation in, the Impersonation Ad?'
- The Federal Register's public-inspection API record lists the filing at 2026-09-30 08:45 Eastern, a publication date of 2026-10-01, the type 'Proposed Rule' and 37 pages.
1 timeline event cites this source
SEC press release 2026-98: SEC Charges Meyer Global Management and Its CEO With Defrauding Retail Investors in Private Funds That Held Interests in SpaceX and Other Pre-IPO Securities
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SEC release dated September 30, 2026 announcing a complaint in the Southern District of New York charging private fund adviser Meyer Global Management LLC and its CEO, Owen E.H. Meyer, with defrauding investors and MGM-managed funds tied to SpaceX and other pre-IPO securities, and seeking injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, civil penalties and a conduct-based injunction against Meyer.
4 extracted facts
- It states the SEC 'today charged private fund adviser Meyer Global Management LLC (MGM) and its CEO, Owen E.H. Meyer, with defrauding investors and MGM-managed funds in connection with investments in SpaceX and other pre-IPO securities.'
- It states: 'In at least three of those schemes, the defendants allegedly misappropriated client assets from certain MGM-managed funds to pay for Meyer's personal expenses.'
- It states the complaint alleges that defendants 'repeatedly failed to address a capital call deficiency owed by an MGM-managed fund in connection with its investment in SpaceX, resulting in the fund forfeiting its nearly $3,000,000 investment.'
- It states the SEC 'seeks permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against both defendants, as well as a conduct-based injunction against Meyer.'
1 timeline event cites this source
SEC v. Meyer Global Management LLC and Owen E. H. Meyer, No. 1:26-cv-08607 (S.D.N.Y.): complaint (ECF 1)
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York)
The SEC's 33-page complaint, filed September 30, 2026. It alleges that from at least 2019 to 2024 MGM and Meyer raised at least $18,500,000 from nearly 100 investors in about 16 affiliated funds, each meant to hold one pre-IPO company such as SpaceX or OpenAI, and that in five schemes since December 2021 they breached their fiduciary duties to those funds, misappropriating at least $1,270,000 in three of them. It charges violations of Advisers Act Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 206(4) and Rule 206(4)-8 and demands a jury trial.
5 extracted facts
- It alleges: 'From at least 2019 to 2024, MGM and Meyer raised at least $18,500,000 from nearly 100 investors by selling interests in MGM-managed funds that held interests in pre-IPO securities'.
- It alleges: 'In three such schemes, Defendants misappropriated a total of at least $1,270,000 of client fund capital to pay for Meyer's lifestyle, personal investments, and investments on behalf of other MGM-advised funds.'
- It alleges the Receiver 'wired $13,829,158.01 to Meyer Equity's bank account' and that defendants 'transferred only approximately $13,142,522 to investors in the Liquidated SpaceX Funds'.
- It alleges that after a fund lost its only assets, 'Defendants told investors to "stay tuned" for information about distributions of SpaceX shares'.
- It states: 'The Commission demands a trial by jury as to all claims so triable.'
1 timeline event cites this source
FTC, States Win Protections to Lower Pesticide Prices for American Farmers in Antitrust Case Against Corteva
Federal Trade Commission
FTC release dated September 28, 2026 announcing a proposed stipulated order, filed in the Middle District of North Carolina, settling the FTC and 12 states' 2022 case against Corteva over its post-patent pesticide loyalty program. For 10 years it bars share-based loyalty terms above 50% and related exclusionary conditions across Corteva's post-patent active ingredients, and requires Corteva to pay the state plaintiffs $35,000,000. The case against Syngenta continues.
5 extracted facts
- It states: 'For a period of 10 years, the stipulated order will prohibit Corteva from conditioning payments or other benefits to a distributor on that firm purchasing a high share of a given pesticide active ingredient from Corteva or similarly limiting its purchases of generic equivalents.'
- It states: 'In addition, the stipulated order requires Corteva to pay the state plaintiffs $35,000,000 to resolve their monetary claims.'
- It states: 'The settlement announced today resolves only the claims against Corteva. Litigation against Syngenta remains ongoing.'
- It states: 'The Commission vote to approve the proposed stipulated order was 2-0. The order was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.'
- It states: 'Stipulated orders have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.'
1 timeline event cites this source
Hugin desk: Ford's 223,472-truck F-150 fuel-tank strap recall
Hugin
Hugin's September 28 record on Ford's recall 26V578 of 223,472 model year 2023 to 2027 F-150 pickups whose front fuel tank strap may not have been fully secured to the frame rail, so the tank may leak or detach while the truck is driven.
4 extracted facts
- The record reports that the recall covers only trucks built from January 4, 2023 to August 27, 2026 that were unsold or had less than three months in service on August 27.
- It reports Ford's estimate that 1% of the trucks have the defect, its count of 16 warranty claims worldwide, and that Ford knows of no crashes or injuries.
- It reports that Ford's filing lists no warning a driver would get and that Ford has not told owners to stop driving.
- It reports that Ford's refund plan for a strap repair an owner already paid for requires the original receipt and work done before September 28, 2026.
1 timeline event cites this source
- Ford's F-150 fuel-tank recall covers 223,472 trucks; the mailed owner letter is now on NHTSA's file →Sep 27, 2026 · records release
Public sources ready to ingest
Import sources create source-run packets, document inventories, and review tokens. They do not publish accusations or graph relationships until the case-file evidence rules are satisfied.
baselineWhat the record currently supports
Claim rows are derived from timeline events and source anchors. They are evidence-status labels, not accusations or final truth claims.
What should be released next
Release requests are lawful public-record asks. They identify source gaps, review gates, and privacy constraints; they are not evidence that a specific person committed wrongdoing.
What stays unresolved
Deliberate gaps in the public record — open until the underlying records are released or reviewed, not questions we have skipped.
- Filed
- Hugin · public social evidence reports
- License
- Text and data are shared under the terms noted at hugin.studio/support · attribution appreciated.
- Fingerprint
E85B 7FED AAAE
For researchers & contributorsSource desk, research joins & machine-readable exportsEverything Hugin uses to grow and audit this file — connection detail, review posture, scout queue, and every export.
Every machine-readable slice of this file
How the public record is joined
Connections are navigation aids. They show where a record, event, or role is sourced; they do not convert association, correspondence, testimony requests, or document appearance into misconduct findings.
Scout queue before promotion
Consumer-protection desk for FTC, CFPB, DOJ, SEC, state enforcement, recall, breach, communications, healthcare transparency, complaint-data, and privacy-sensitive source review.
Source leads and automated probes are review inventory. They become verified anchors only after Hugin can attach the public record, legal posture, and no-allegation guardrails.
Public-record joins are wired into exports
These are not loose TODOs anymore. Each lane below is computed from the case file's source tiers, then joined to matching sources, timeline events, role nodes, and release-roadmap requests.
Index FTC warning letters, complaints, settlements, final orders, legal-library records, dates, respondents, and posture labels.
Join SEC working-group, litigation-release, complaint, final-judgment, and investor-alert rows with explicit legal posture.
Preserve product, company-response, publication-delay, privacy, and non-statistical-sample caveats before using complaint data.
Index payment-year, reporting entity, covered-recipient type, amount, nature of payment, ownership rows, dispute context, and API/export links.
Join Recalls.gov, CPSC, NHTSA, FDA, and openFDA rows by agency, product type, hazard, remedy, status, date, and official release URL.
Index covered entity, state, affected-count band, breach type, submission date, and business-associate status while suppressing patient details.
Block private identifiers, consumer narratives, precise location details, account data, and medical/financial identifiers from public snippets.
Index CFPB action status, respondent, product, filed date, complaint/order documents, and legal posture.
Preserve FCC document type, released date, order/notice/consent posture, proceeding number, and consumer-facing issue area.
Help grow the source queue
Hugin accepts public records, not accusations. A submitted URL lands in a review lane, gets source-validated, and only becomes a case anchor after the evidence rules and privacy gates are satisfied.
What this case can prove right now
Fact-check status is a review posture, not a verdict. Source-scout rows are leads until a reviewer joins them to publishable anchors; claim-ledger rows are timeline-derived and still require source validation plus no-allegation guardrails before promotion.
Queue a public record
Paste an official or public-record URL. Hugin classifies the lane first, keeps lead-only material quarantined, and requires source validation before anything reaches the case file.
Queue a public source for review.Latest submitted public URLs
Sanitized queue view: Hugin shows the public URL, lane, status, and why a source has not been promoted. Submitter identifiers are not shown.
Submit sources, not claims
A source is a public URL someone else can inspect. A claim is an interpretation. Hugin queues sources first and keeps claims out until a reviewed public record supports the exact wording.
Official agency pages, court dockets, congressional releases, civil records, state updates, and public repositories with source URLs.
Publisher, date, record family, and why the URL belongs in this file.
Source URLs first. Context is welcome, but claims do not publish from submissions alone.
Private tips, survivor identifiers, sealed or leaked material, graphic details, and private contact data.
Screenshots or social posts without a public source URL.
Misconduct labels for living people unless the exact cited public record supports that exact statement.
Case change ledger
Audit feed for source anchors, queue decisions, privacy-review jobs, and hashes. It explains the process without turning leads into claims.
CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.ada00aecc6deCFPB Enforcement Actions
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.3396bfb99fdeCPSC recalls API
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.c31f2d2eec8bFDA recalls, market withdrawals, and safety alerts
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.a0b454456069FTC privacy and security enforcement index
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.ff8d16bfd25eNHTSA vehicle, equipment, tire, and car-seat recall search
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.72c35bd598ecRecalls.gov federal recall portal
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.0467720ed4bdSEC Litigation Releases
- Status
- needs human privacy review
- Evidence state
- metadata only
- Lane
- privacy triage
Extract document index and source metadata first.
Next: Metadata extraction includes publisher, URL, document family, and date.ff0779ee240eCase file hash snapshot
- Status
- hash changed when case bundle changes
- Evidence state
- metadata only
Mirrors can compare this hash to verify the same case file bundle.
Next: Compare the short hash in the UI with this machine-readable ledger.e85b7fedaaaeDocument manifest hash snapshot
- Status
- hash changed when document handling changes
- Evidence state
- metadata only
This binds document mirroring and privacy-triage rules.
Next: Compare the short hash in the UI with this machine-readable ledger.dc3ad1d2ec30