The November 2 edition

50,710 claims pending.
How long have they waited?

Six November 2 reports distinguish a compensation tally from waiting times, survey and chemical proposals from final rules, and inspection requests from agency decisions.

6 reports
0 commentary
0 connected standing files

A dated edition of the record read and filed on November 2, 2026, Arizona time. The dates and statuses below describe that reading; later developments belong in the linked archive and its correction notices.

01 / Read the record

Compensation and public data

A claims tally leaves timing unanswered; a proposed survey revision invites public comment.

DOJ status table | updated November 22 min read · 2 source receipts

Justice Department reports 50,710 radiation compensation claims pending under the amended law

A Justice Department table updated November 2 lists 50,710 pending claims under the 2025 law that reauthorized the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act. It reports 13,042 approvals and 223 denials in that group. The table does not say how long pending claims have waited or whether approved amounts have been paid.

Why it matters: DOJ lists 50,710 pending claims under the 2025 law that reauthorized radiation compensation. Claims are not a count of distinct people.
What to watch: The program says claims must be filed by December 31, 2027. Aggregate distributions by category could show pending-claim age and decision times without disclosing private files.

The limit. The table does not show claim age, reasons for pending claims, or whether approved amounts were paid.

How this record was read

Read November 2 Arizona time, fetched directly from the Justice Department: its awards-to-date table and Radiation Exposure Compensation Act program page. Limits: the table reports claim statuses and approved amounts, not the age of pending claims, reasons they remain pending, or payments actually made.

Information collection | changes proposed2 min read · 1 source receipt

Census proposes removing survey questions on solar panels and veterans' service periods

The Census Bureau proposes removing its solar panels and veterans period of military service questions from the American Community Survey in 2028. It also intends to expand the use of administrative data, potentially skipping other questions for some respondents. To ensure consideration, comments on the proposed collection must be received by January 4, 2027.

Why it matters: Census proposes removing two questions from the American Community Survey in 2028 and expanding administrative-data use for some respondents.
What to watch: Comments on the proposed American Community Survey and Puerto Rico Community Survey revision must be received by January 4, 2027.

The limit. The changes are proposed, not final OMB approval. The notice does not establish how any particular funding allocation would change.

How this record was read

Read November 2 Arizona time, fetched directly from govinfo: the Census Bureau's published Federal Register notice on revising the American Community Survey and Puerto Rico Community Survey. Limits: the two question removals are proposals, administrative-data substitution remains subject to research, and the notice is not final approval by OMB.

02 / Read the record

Transportation oversight

Two inspection-waiver petitions remain requests; a separate aircraft directive is a final rule.

Comment extensions | no waiver granted2 min read · 4 source receipts

Rail agency extends comments on two locomotive inspection waiver requests to December 2

The Federal Railroad Administration has extended the comment periods for separate Union Pacific and CSX locomotive inspection waiver petitions until December 2. Each request concerns inspections performed by qualified mechanical inspectors on certain microprocessor-equipped locomotives. The November 2 notices extend comment periods; they do not grant either waiver.

Why it matters: The FRA extended comments on separate Union Pacific and CSX requests concerning qualified mechanical inspectors and certain microprocessor-equipped locomotives.
What to watch: Comments on both separate petitions are due December 2, 2026. Each has its own docket.

The limit. The petitions and the companies' underlying inspection data were not independently read. The extensions do not grant either request.

How this record was read

Read November 2 Arizona time, fetched directly from govinfo: the FRA's two November 2 extension notices and its September 1 notices describing the separate petitions. Limits: the petitions and underlying company inspection data were not independently read; the extensions do not grant a waiver.

Final FAA directive | specified Boeing 787s2 min read · 1 source receipt

FAA orders sealant checks on certain Boeing 787 fuel tanks

The FAA is requiring inspections and adhesion tests of certain Boeing 787 fuel-tank sealant installations after a report that required production inspections were not performed. The agency estimates the directive affects 60 U.S.-registered airplanes. It takes effect December 7 and addresses a potential lightning-related explosion risk, not a reported explosion.

Why it matters: The FAA requires sealant inspections and adhesion tests on certain 787s after a report that production inspections were not performed.
What to watch: The directive is effective December 7, 2026. The FAA estimates 60 U.S.-registered airplanes are affected.

The limit. The directive does not cover every 787 or report a fuel-tank explosion. The referenced bulletin and production records were not independently examined.

How this record was read

Read November 2 Arizona time, fetched directly from GovInfo: the FAA's published final airworthiness directive and responses to comments. Limits: the referenced Boeing bulletin and underlying production records were not separately examined; the directive describes a potential unsafe condition.

03 / Read the record

Land and chemical rules

A proposed chemical notification requirement and a final administrative-site lease rule have different effects.

EPA proposal | specified new uses2 min read · 1 source receipt

EPA proposes advance review for new uses of chemicals already under orders

The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing rules for certain chemicals already subject to federal orders. If finalized as proposed, manufacturers and processors planning specified new uses would need to notify the agency at least 90 days in advance and wait for its review and required action. Comments are due December 2.

Why it matters: Manufacturers and processors planning specified new uses of certain chemicals would need advance notice and EPA review if the proposal is finalized.
What to watch: Comments are due December 2, 2026. The proposed notice period is at least 90 days before a covered use begins.

The limit. This is not a general ban or a finding that an injury occurred. The underlying orders and independent exposure data were not separately examined.

How this record was read

Read November 2 Arizona time, fetched directly from GovInfo: the Federal Register's published EPA proposed rule and its substance-specific descriptions. Limits: the proposal is not final; the underlying orders and independent exposure data were not separately examined.

Final Forest Service rule | December 2 effective2 min read · 1 source receipt

Forest Service changes how administrative-site leases are regulated

A final Forest Service rule removes certain administrative-site leases from the agency's special-use regulations effective December 2. USDA says the change is meant to make redevelopment financing more feasible, including for housing. Commenters raised concerns about public land and cultural protections; the department says the rule does not authorize land sales or remove applicable statutory requirements.

Why it matters: Certain administrative-site leases leave the agency's special-use regulations; USDA says it aims to make site redevelopment financing more feasible.
What to watch: The rule takes effect December 2, 2026. USDA says applicable statutory requirements remain.

The limit. The rule itself approves no individual lease or land sale. Individual comment letters and particular redevelopment projects were not separately examined.

How this record was read

Read November 2 Arizona time, fetched directly from GovInfo: the published Forest Service final rule, including its summaries of comments and USDA responses. Limits: individual comment letters and any particular lease or redevelopment project were not separately examined.