Likely scam.
OP posted vague 'internet money' success with zero product detail, then deployed a coordinated comment section featuring sock-puppet accounts (6 insular accounts only active in this thread) and a shared domain (waitlistsnow.com) posted by two accounts (astubborndeer and outcomechemical7131) to create manufactured legitimacy. The top comment even explicitly calls out the 'fake it till you make it' playbook, and multiple accounts use grift-funnel language ('social proof', 'fake it till you make it') typical of scam copy.
Hugin marked this as likely scam because multiple structural signals stacked high enough that the post should not be treated as organic.
- The final verdict text came from the AI verdict engine using the stored structural signal block.
- The scan reviewed 75 comments and 69 unique commenter accounts.
- Signal count: 2 high, 3 medium, 0 low flags; 4 coordination-class signals.
Comments saying 'DM me', 'link in bio', or claiming to have already DM'd OP are how scam posts route victims off-Reddit to private chats.
Full evidence trailSources, public checklist, values lens, network map, account coverage, archive, and sharing tools.
Review before sharing.
Hugin reports are evidence packets, not accusations. Use the rating as a prompt to inspect sources, limitations, and archived material before quoting a claim elsewhere.
IM FINALLY MAKING INTERNET MONEY!!!
Source checks
81 public comments loaded for r/buildinpublic.
Public comment bodies were retained with the report snapshot.
2 author age values were unavailable after Reddit profile JSON, old Reddit profile HTML, and archive fallbacks.
8 selected author histories checked; 1 unavailable, 3 partial, 7 archive fallback.
75 reply edges mapped.
Stylometry did not run for this scan, usually because no key/budget or too few samples were available.
3 unique external identifiers extracted.
0 prior archive matches returned.
Show your work
Deterministic explanation of the stored scan inputs behind the verdict. This is not hidden model reasoning; it is the evidence checklist Hugin can show publicly.
Hugin marked this as likely scam because multiple structural signals stacked high enough that the post should not be treated as organic.
- The final verdict text came from the AI verdict engine using the stored structural signal block.
- The scan reviewed 75 comments and 69 unique commenter accounts.
- Signal count: 2 high, 3 medium, 0 low flags; 4 coordination-class signals.
- The scan crossed the high-risk threshold through stacked structural evidence.
What pushed risk up
Multiple commenters posting structurally identical text — same phrasing, same length, same praise pattern — is a fingerprint of a single operator running multiple accounts.
- u/solo-indie-dev, u/TradingToReplace9to5, u/mlxcoder — "Congratulations!…"
Posting the exact same link in 2+ different subreddits is the textbook fingerprint of an affiliate or marketing operator — not someone organically sharing a discovery.
- u/cymaticstatic dropped v.redd.it/8mck0xoa053h1 in r/ClaudeCode, r/PiCodingAgent
Comments saying 'DM me', 'link in bio', or claiming to have already DM'd OP are how scam posts route victims off-Reddit to private chats.
- u/thejagrukindian: "So you sell reusable ui components? If yes dm me…"
Accounts with almost no prior history that turn up specifically to comment on a promotional post are usually exactly that — a throwaway created for this thread.
- u/mlxcoder — 1 item total, 1 in the last 24h
- u/worldlypry808 — 2 items total, 2 in the last 24h
u/astubborndeer, u/outcomechemical7131 all linked "waitlistsnow.com". Innocent co-mention is possible (two people genuinely citing the same source), but it's still worth surfacing.
1 external identifier appeared under more than one Reddit account in this scan.
- ext_domain "waitlistsnow.com" posted by u/astubborndeer, u/outcomechemical7131
3 author histories showed drop-in, dormant, or cross-promotion behavior.
- u/mlxcoder: 1 recent item, 1 in 24h
- u/worldlypry808: 2 recent items, 2 in 24h
- u/cymaticstatic: v.redd.it/8mck0xoa053h1 repeated across 2 subs
What limited confidence
2 scanned authors had unknown account age. Profile metadata remained unavailable for 2 hosted fetches after archive fallbacks. Absence of young-account signals is lower confidence.
What kept the rating lower
Hugin mapped 75 reply edges and did not find a mutual-reply clique.
- 2 author account ages were unavailable after profile metadata and archive fallbacks.
- 68 author age values are a lower-bound estimate from oldest archived public activity, not an official Reddit account-created timestamp.
- 1 selected author history was unavailable to the scan.
- Stylometry did not run, usually because no API key/budget was available or too few useful samples existed.
- Username shape alone is never treated as a finding; it is only context when stronger public signals also appear.
- Likely scam: multiple high-severity signals, prior identifier reuse, or several coordination signals stacking together.
- Suspicious: one high-severity signal, multiple medium signals, or one concrete coordination signal that deserves review.
- Inconclusive: weak, conflicting, or partial signals where the scan cannot justify either trust or a stronger warning.
- Looks legitimate: no structural red flags, available metadata, and clean coordination passes.
Values lens
Use scans to slow down, inspect public signals, and keep uncertainty visible. Never use them to harass, shame, or flatten people into a verdict.
Fair-use checks
- What was observed, and what is interpretation?
- What data is missing, blocked, or confidence-limiting?
- Would the wording feel fair if it were about someone you care about?
What the post is doing
- Shared external domain 'waitlistsnow.com' posted by 2 distinct accounts (astubborndeer, outcomechemical7131) — same-operator coordination signal
- 6 insular accounts active ONLY within this thread with zero prior history — classic sock-puppet reply ring
- Vague post title ('IM FINALLY MAKING INTERNET MONEY!!!') + empty body ('just thought I would share my success, you can do it too!') with no product description — grift-funnel setup
- Multiple near-identical comments using 'fake it till you make it' and 'social proof' language (FugteApp, cymaticstatic) — manufactured engagement to normalize deception
- Top comment by AStubbornDeer explicitly documents the scam playbook (fake payment page, fake users) while linking to the shared domain — coordination evidence disguised as criticism
Automated flags
Comments saying 'DM me', 'link in bio', or claiming to have already DM'd OP are how scam posts route victims off-Reddit to private chats.
- u/thejagrukindian: "So you sell reusable ui components? If yes dm me…"
Multiple commenters posting structurally identical text — same phrasing, same length, same praise pattern — is a fingerprint of a single operator running multiple accounts.
- u/solo-indie-dev, u/TradingToReplace9to5, u/mlxcoder — "Congratulations!…"
Accounts with almost no prior history that turn up specifically to comment on a promotional post are usually exactly that — a throwaway created for this thread.
- u/mlxcoder — 1 item total, 1 in the last 24h
- u/worldlypry808 — 2 items total, 2 in the last 24h
Posting the exact same link in 2+ different subreddits is the textbook fingerprint of an affiliate or marketing operator — not someone organically sharing a discovery.
- u/cymaticstatic dropped v.redd.it/8mck0xoa053h1 in r/ClaudeCode, r/PiCodingAgent
u/astubborndeer, u/outcomechemical7131 all linked "waitlistsnow.com". Innocent co-mention is possible (two people genuinely citing the same source), but it's still worth surfacing.
Shared signals
External identifiers (wallets, Telegram/Discord, referral links, promo codes, external URLs, emails) extracted from the post body and comments. Different accounts pointing at the same identifier — inside one thread or across separate reports — is the strongest coordination signal Hugin can show, sourced entirely from public post content.
In this thread
Coordination map
Who replied to whom in the scanned comments. Organic threads branch out from the post; accounts that reply back and forth to each other or hub around one shared identifier are the structural fingerprints of a coordinated pod. This shows the most significant pattern found, not every commenter. 48 peripheral accounts omitted from analysis entirely.
Commenter patterns
Recent public Reddit activity for the OP and selected accounts, plus same-hand writing checks when the stylometry pass runs. These are coverage-limited evidence summaries, not identity or availability claims.
- r/buildinpublic (7)
- r/AiAutomations (1)
- r/ArtificialNtelligence (1)
- r/sideprojects (1)
- i.redd.it (1)
Reddit returned only part of this account's recent public activity during the scan.
- r/Adsense (3)
- r/SEO_Marketing_Offers (2)
- r/buildinpublic (1)
- r/astrojs (1)
Reddit blocked the recent-activity fetch from Hugin's scanner during this run. Treat this as missing coverage, not a finding about the account.
Reddit returned only part of this account's recent public activity during the scan.
- r/buildinpublic (1)
- r/SaaS (12)
- r/buildinpublic (3)
- r/FirstTimeHomeBuyer (2)
- r/productivity (2)
- i.redd.it (1)
Reddit returned only part of this account's recent public activity during the scan.
- r/buildinpublic (1)
- r/appledevelopers (1)
- r/buildinpublic (11)
- r/indiehackers (7)
- r/micro_saas (6)
- r/canva (3)
- r/PiCodingAgent (15)
- r/SideProject (5)
- r/SaaS (3)
- r/ClaudeCode (2)
- v.redd.it (2)
- v.redd.it/8mck0xoa053h1 (2x across 2 subs)
Account age coverage
OP and scanned commenters are shown when Hugin recovered profile metadata or an oldest-public-activity age floor. Lower-bound ages are labeled as estimates; unknown age remains missing coverage, not a finding about the account.
Archived evidence
Snapshot of the post and comments at scan time. Preserved here so the evidence survives even if it gets deleted on Reddit.
- u/AStubbornDeerscore 0A new marketing strategy detected: - create an app - no any users - create a page showing payments (nobody can tell it that it's not true) - publish like you have users - you will really have users after that (maybe). Proof? This: https://www.waitlistsnow.com/product-demo Failed to fetch waitlist: TypeError: Failed to fetch Nobody will pay for non-working product.
- u/WorldlyPry808score 0That is work🤔🤔🤔🤔
- u/FugteAppscore 0Exactly “fake it till you make it” 😂 Trust is much harder to earn than clicks
- u/AStubbornDeerscore 0Fake it till you make is a strategy towards your potential clients, not towards your peer founders.
- u/cymaticstaticscore 0I mean... When it comes down to it, this is technically the verbatim the underlying concept of "social proof." Robert Caldini, Principles of Persuasion
- u/Valentinbuildsscore 0Congratulations!! What is you product? Curious to know..
- u/OutcomeChemical7131score 0Thanks! It’s called WaitlistNow (waitlistsnow dot com) and I’ve slowly been raising prices, which I think is a good move. So that’s why the pricing may not reflect the sales shown :)
- u/abiznizscore 0There’s literally no info about what your app does on your home page
Original on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/buildinpublic/comments/1uka7l3/im_finally_making_internet_money/ — “IM FINALLY MAKING INTERNET MONEY!!!”
Share this report
Share this link in a Reddit reply when the thread needs supporting evidence. The report stays public so anyone reading the thread can review the data themselves.
Reports like this stay free for everyone. Keep Hugin free →