Skip to content
Hugin

2026 candidate · follow the money

Who funds Connie Chan?

California U.S. House District 11DemocratFiled for an open seatFEC H6CA11268

The money.

Raised
$2.4M
Spent
$1.8M
Cash on hand
$582K
  • Individuals 89% $2.1M
  • PACs & other committees 11% $254K
  • Other receipts 0.1% $3,476

Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

Outside groups: $773K supporting · $11K opposing ($178K of it designated for the general election)

Biggest spenders supporting

  1. PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY ACTIONHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $475K
  2. SF SOLIDARITY PACSuper PACAll of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $178K
  3. SF FOR ALLSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $105K
  4. ASIANS AMERICAN FOR REPRESENTATIONSuper PAC $12K
  5. WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $3,384

Biggest spenders opposing

  1. A FIGHT WORTH HAVINGSuper PAC $11K

Largest direct PAC contributions

  1. MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSUnion PAC · International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers $10K
  2. SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)Union PAC · Service Employees International Union $10K
  3. UNITE HERE TIP CAMPAIGN COMMITTEEUnion PAC · Unite Here $10K
  4. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS CAMPAIGN ASSISTANCE FUNDUnion PAC · International Brotherhood Of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmith, Forgers & Helpe $10K
  5. UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PAC (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING & PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA)Union PAC · Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 22 PAC Inc $10K

Who gave.

Who gives $2.1M from individuals

10% in small-dollar gifts

$216K of $2.1M came unitemized: from donors whose gifts to the campaign this cycle total $200 or less, whom the campaign does not have to name.

The itemized gifts below add up to $809K of the $1.9M the campaign reported itemizing through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet processed the rest into its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026 for this campaign.

95% from California · 5% from elsewhere

Of itemized gifts, by the state on each donor's mailing address. Giving from other states is lawful and common.

79% of itemized dollars came earmarked through a conduit such as ActBlue or WinRed; each gift is counted once.

Top states

  1. California $771K
  2. Washington $7,610
  3. New York $6,301
  4. District of Columbia $3,500
  5. Virginia $2,750
  6. Massachusetts $2,643
  7. Illinois $2,500
  8. Texas $1,800

Top employers named by donors

  1. UCSF $11K
  2. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO $5,784
  3. HONGS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION $5,000
  4. KINSON VENTURES $4,500
  5. MINAMI TAMAKI LLP $3,000
  6. CCSF $2,992
  7. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO $2,320
  8. STATE OF CALIFORNIA $1,225
  9. KAISER PERMANENTE $1,000

Employers as donors wrote them on the form. A company listed here did not give this money; people who work there did.

Retired, self-employed, not employed or not given: $445K. Employers named by fewer than three donors, or filed as a person's name: $326K, not listed so no one donor is singled out.

Summary through Oct 14, 2026. Itemized gifts dated Nov 15, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, net of refunds (1,797 entries). Every itemized contribution on FEC.gov ↗

From the principal campaign committee's FEC reports; joint-fundraising transfers and later reports are not included, and no donor is named here. A contribution is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.

Outside money in the final weeks.

Outside spending including late reports: $1.2M for / $11K against · $79K in the final two weeks

That is $389K more than the $784K in regular reports alone. Source: FEC regular reports plus 24- and 48-hour reports they do not yet cover. The final two weeks run Oct 21, 2026 to Nov 3, 2026, by the date each ad or mailing went out.

$921K of the $1.3M on late reports was filed as an estimate. A 24- or 48-hour report is due within a day or two of the spending; the spender's later regular report carries the final cost.

What it bought, per the late reports

  • TV, radio & streaming TV 0.4% $5,000
  • Digital ads 53% $695K
  • Mail, print & signs 1% $17K
  • Phones & texts 2% $25K
  • Canvassing & field 40% $522K
  • Ad production 0.6% $7,611
  • Other or unclassified 3% $40K

Latest dissemination on these reports: November 2, 2026. FEC 24- and 48-hour independent-expenditure reports read November 4, 2026, with amended and re-filed reports counted once (30 entries). These reports on FEC.gov ↗

Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate and is not the candidate's money. Purposes are grouped from each spender's own description, so the groups are approximate. A dollar figure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.

Where it went.

Where the money went $723K in itemized spending

These itemized payments cover $723K of the $1.8M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

  • Advertising & outreach 36% $261K
  • Consultants & strategy 22% $160K
  • Staff & payroll 12% $89K
  • Fundraising & processing fees 9% $68K
  • Polling, research & data 5% $38K
  • Travel, meals & events 3% $24K
  • Office, technology & overhead 4% $28K
  • Legal & compliance 7% $53K
  • Other or unclassified 0.3% $2,315

Largest payees

  1. ARMOUR EVANS MEDIA LLC $168K
  2. GUSTO $86K
  3. MJE STRATEGIES LLC $81K
  4. WEST WEST DIGITAL $61K
  5. GROWTH POLITICAL STRATEGIES $44K

Paid to individuals: $37K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

Payments dated Nov 23, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (302 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

Others who filed for this seat.

Questions worth asking.

Money shows who backed a campaign, not how a person will act. Compare it with what they did and said: their votes or official actions if they have held office, their own statements, and their answers to a finding. Use the same questions for every candidate.

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing. This page identifies the filing by its FEC candidate ID; a person can hold more than one filing.