Skip to content
Hugin

2026 outside spending · who is behind it

Who is behind JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PAC?

Hybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primariesFEC C00630665

In FEC filings processed so far, JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PAC reported $4.5M in independent expenditures in 2026 House and Senate races: $2.9M supporting and $1.6M opposing candidates, across 18 candidates. The filer designated 0% of it for the general election.

Who it spent for and against.

Independent expenditures are, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate. Spending for a candidate is the group's own advertising or outreach, not a contribution to the campaign.

Supporting · $2.9M

  1. Darializa Avila Chevalier Democrat · New York U.S. House District 13$1.0M
  2. Donavan McKinney Democrat · Michigan U.S. House District 13$461K
  3. Melat Kiros Democrat · Colorado U.S. House District 1$306K
  4. Claire Valdez Democrat · New York U.S. House District 7$279K
  5. Christopher M. Rabb Democrat · Pennsylvania U.S. House District 3$260K
  6. Adam Hamawy Democrat · New Jersey U.S. House District 12$191K
  7. Nida Allam Democrat · North Carolina U.S. House District 4$172K
  8. Frederick Haynes III Democrat · Texas U.S. House District 30$100K
  9. Junaid Ahmed Democrat · Illinois U.S. House District 8$57K
  10. Mai Vang Democrat · California U.S. House District 7$30K
  11. Justin J. Pearson Democrat · Tennessee U.S. House District 9$1,234

Opposing · $1.6M

  1. Adriano Espaillat Democrat · New York U.S. House District 13$525K
  2. Shri Thanedar Democrat · Michigan U.S. House District 13$429K
  3. Valerie Foushee Democrat · North Carolina U.S. House District 4$218K
  4. Diana L Degette Democrat · Colorado U.S. House District 1$207K
  5. Doris Matsui Democrat · California U.S. House District 7$120K
  6. Antonio Reynoso Democrat · New York U.S. House District 7$93K
  7. Melissa Luburich Bean Democrat · Illinois U.S. House District 8$57K

Who funds it.

Listed: organizations and committees that gave this group at least $10K this cycle, and individuals who gave it at least $250K (counting contributions of $5,000 or more), named and employed as filed with the FEC. Smaller donors are not named here and no address is shown.

These funders account for $3.6M of the $5.9M in itemized receipts this group reported for the cycle (61%). Receipts include transfers from other committees and can include refunds or loans.

Organizations

  1. THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST UNDERSTANDING (IMEU) POLICY PROJECT Organization, as filed$785K
  2. ORGANIZE FOR JUSTICE Organization, as filed$66K
  3. 128 COLLECTIVE Organization, as filed$50K

Individuals giving at least $250K

  1. Saikat Chakrabarti Employer as filed: NEW CONSENSUS$2.0M
  2. Allen Liu Employer as filed: NOT EMPLOYED$655K

What this does not show.

A gift to an outside group is not a gift to any candidate, and nothing here shows that a funder chose, saw or approved a particular ad. When a funder is a nonprofit, a company or another group, the FEC record names that donor and stops: the people and companies who fund it are not shown unless it reports them to the FEC. Groups that do not file with the FEC, state-level groups and late 24- and 48-hour reports are not included.

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Outside spending is independent expenditures for or against named 2026 House and Senate candidates, itemized by committees in the FEC bulk files, primaries included, with the general-election share as each filer designated it. Funders are itemized receipts in the FEC bulk files for the cycle. Late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs, independent expenditures reported by groups that are not political committees, state-level groups and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor, agreement or wrongdoing.