Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

California U.S. House District 46

3 filings report $1.6M raised, and outside groups reported $107K in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
Lou CorreaDemocrat · Filed as incumbent$1.5M34%57%0%$1.0M$2.3M$107K—
David PanRepublican · Filed as challenger$104K88%2%9%$105K$1,856——
Christian MendezDemocrat · Filed as challenger$2,31721%0%79%$2,313$5——

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · J. Luis Correa

    In the U.S. House (CA-46) since 2017 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 21 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 2 committees: Homeland Security, Judiciary · 4 subcommittees
    • 194 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 3 committees reported outside spending for or against them

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H6CA46116) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $1.5M
    Spent
    $1.0M
    Cash on hand
    $2.3M
    • Individuals 34% $494K
    • PACs & other committees 57% $839K
    • Other receipts 10% $141K

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $19K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $107K supporting · $0 opposing ($5 of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. PROTECT PROGRESSSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $107K
    2. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES' COMMUNITY ACTION FUND PACSuper PAC $11
    3. SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTIONSuper PAC $10

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERSUnion PAC · United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America $10K
    2. MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSUnion PAC · International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers $10K
    3. AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC)Trade association PAC · American Bankers Association (aba) $10K

    Where the money went $611K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $611K of the $1.0M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 18% $112K
    • Consultants & strategy 18% $112K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 14% $88K
    • Travel, meals & events 0.4% $2,376
    • Office, technology & overhead 5% $33K
    • Legal & compliance 10% $59K
    • Other or unclassified 34% $206K

    Largest payees

    1. THINK INC $205K
    2. CITI CARDS $171K
    3. HM CONSULTING $81K
    4. MARTINEZ & ASSOCIATES, INC. $44K
    5. CHASE CARDMEMBER SERVICE $29K

    Paid to individuals: $5,097, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 3, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (250 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $104K
    Spent
    $105K
    Cash on hand
    $1,856
    Debts
    $33K
    • Individuals 88% $92K
    • PACs & other committees 2% $2,250
    • Candidate's own money & loans 9% $9,000
    • Other receipts 0.8% $809

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. EUREKA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEELeadership PAC of Ken Calvert $2,000
    2. BACK THE BOLDPAC with no sponsoring organization $1,000

    Where the money went $80K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $80K of the $105K the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Oct 9, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 33% $26K
    • Consultants & strategy 4% $3,300
    • Fundraising & processing fees 3% $2,000
    • Travel, meals & events 0.6% $500
    • Office, technology & overhead 1% $900
    • Legal & compliance 13% $10K
    • Other or unclassified 46% $37K

    Largest payees

    1. CHASE CARD $30K
    2. LYSA RAY CAMPAIGN SERVICES $15K
    3. PAISANO $9,600
    4. SECRETARY OF STATE $1,633
    5. ORANGE COUNTY CHINESE-AMERICAN CHAMBER, OCCACC $900

    Paid to individuals: $21K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 8, 2025 to Oct 9, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (56 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $2,317
    Spent
    $2,313
    Cash on hand
    $5
    • Individuals 21% $489
    • Candidate's own money & loans 79% $1,828

    Campaign totals through Sep 30, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $2,047 in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $2,047 of the $2,313 the campaign reported spending through Sep 30, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Sep 20, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 12% $248
    • Office, technology & overhead 88% $1,799

    Largest payees

    1. CHRISTIAN MENDEZ FOR CONGRESS $307

    Paid to individuals: $1,740, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Feb 27, 2026 to Sep 20, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (4 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Francisco Bahena.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.