Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

Kentucky U.S. House District 1

3 filings report $2.5M raised, and outside groups reported $379 in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
James ComerRepublican · Filed as incumbent$2.3M75%25%0%$3.9M$1.6M——
John Andrew WilliamsDemocrat · Filed as challenger$223K91%7%1%$214K$7,977$379—
David SimsRepublican · Filed as challenger$1,8000%0%100%$1,501$299——

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

  • RURAL FREEDOM NETWORKSuper PACAll of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$378 for John Andrew Williams
  • NEW POWER PACSuper PAC$1 for John Andrew Williams

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · James Comer

    In the U.S. House (KY-1) since 2016 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 24 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 2 committees: Education and Workforce, Oversight and Government Reform (Chair) · 2 subcommittees
    • 148 committees reported contributions to them this cycle

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H6KY01110) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $2.3M
    Spent
    $3.9M
    Cash on hand
    $1.6M
    • Individuals 75% $1.7M
    • PACs & other committees 25% $569K
    • Other receipts <0.1% $893

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $22K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC)Trade association PAC · American Bankers Association (aba) $10K
    2. ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ABC PAC)Trade association PAC $10K
    3. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEMembership group PAC · National Association Of Realtors $10K

    Where the money went $1.6M in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $1.6M of the $3.9M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 51% $813K
    • Consultants & strategy 7% $115K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 20% $323K
    • Polling, research & data 3% $47K
    • Travel, meals & events 7% $115K
    • Office, technology & overhead 2% $27K
    • Legal & compliance 3% $48K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.3% $4,407
    • Other or unclassified 6% $99K

    Largest payees

    1. MDI IMAGING & MAIL $300K
    2. FULFILLMENT SOLUTIONS INC $260K
    3. 814 CONSULTING LLC $142K
    4. HSP DIRECT LLC $113K
    5. GRV STRATEGIES LLC $65K

    Paid to individuals: $62K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (567 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $223K
    Spent
    $214K
    Cash on hand
    $7,977
    Debts
    $2,900
    • Individuals 91% $204K
    • PACs & other committees 7% $17K
    • Candidate's own money & loans 1% $2,900
    • Other receipts <0.1% $72

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

    Outside groups: $379 supporting · $0 opposing ($378 of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. RURAL FREEDOM NETWORKSuper PACAll of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $378
    2. NEW POWER PACSuper PAC $1

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. UAW - V - CAP (UAW VOLUNTARY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM) 'INT'L UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA UAWUnion PAC · Int'L Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Of America Uaw $10K

    Where the money went $93K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $93K of the $214K the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 40% $37K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 45% $41K
    • Polling, research & data 2% $1,750
    • Travel, meals & events 2% $2,081
    • Office, technology & overhead 3% $2,486
    • Legal & compliance 0.5% $500
    • Other or unclassified 9% $8,000

    Largest payees

    1. NEPTUNE POLITICAL LLC $27K
    2. OH CHARLIE JO $15K
    3. C2G STRATEGIES $9,857
    4. SCALE TO WIN $7,397
    5. OH CHARLI JO! $6,009

    Payments dated Jun 11, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (239 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $1,800
    Spent
    $1,501
    Cash on hand
    $299
    • Candidate's own money & loans 100% $1,800

    Campaign totals through Jul 19, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $1,190 in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $1,190 of the $1,501 the campaign reported spending through Jul 19, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Apr 6, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 57% $673
    • Office, technology & overhead 43% $517

    Largest payees

    1. VISTAPRINT $1,190

    Payments dated Dec 10, 2025 to Apr 6, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (2 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Robert James Sutherby.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.