Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

North Carolina U.S. House District 9

3 filings report $6.4M raised, and outside groups reported $372K in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
Richard L. Hudson Jr.Republican · Filed as incumbent$3.4M41%58%0%$3.9M$926K—$366K
Richard N. OjedaDemocrat · Filed as challenger$2.9M99%1%0%$2.9M$46K$6,335—
Nigel William BristowDemocrat · Filed as challenger$5,737100%0%0%$1,195$38K——

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

  • AB PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)All of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$366K against Richard L. Hudson Jr.
  • REBELLION PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)$5,000 for Richard N. Ojeda
  • TURN LEFT PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)$1,335 for Richard N. Ojeda

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · Richard Hudson

    In the U.S. House (NC-9) since 2013 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 24 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 1 committee: Energy and Commerce · 1 subcommittee
    • 406 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 1 committee reported outside spending for or against them

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H2NC08185) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $3.4M
    Spent
    $3.9M
    Cash on hand
    $926K
    • Individuals 41% $1.4M
    • PACs & other committees 58% $2.0M
    • Other receipts 0.7% $23K

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $740K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $0 supporting · $366K opposing

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. AB PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)All of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $366K

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. BUILD POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS (BUILDPAC)Trade association PAC · National Association Of Home Builders $10K
    2. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION RURAL BROADBAND PACTrade association PAC · National Telecommunications Cooperative Association $10K
    3. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NABPAC)Trade association PAC · National Association Of Broadcasters $10K

    Where the money went $1.7M in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $1.7M of the $3.9M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 9% $156K
    • Consultants & strategy 23% $386K
    • Staff & payroll 5% $79K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 48% $795K
    • Polling, research & data 2% $40K
    • Travel, meals & events 4% $60K
    • Office, technology & overhead 3% $48K
    • Legal & compliance 3% $49K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.8% $13K
    • Other or unclassified 3% $47K

    Largest payees

    1. REID POLITICAL CONSULTING, LLC DBA REPUBLIC STRATEGIES, LLC $577K
    2. ONMESSAGE DIGITAL FUNDRAISING $236K
    3. LCC INC $178K
    4. STRATEGIC ADVANCE SERVICES, LLC $144K
    5. ADP $79K

    Paid to individuals: $59K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 2, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (1,260 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $2.9M
    Spent
    $2.9M
    Cash on hand
    $46K
    • Individuals 99% $2.9M
    • PACs & other committees 1% $33K
    • Party committees <0.1% $1,004
    • Other receipts <0.1% $300

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

    Outside groups: $6,335 supporting · $0 opposing ($5,000 of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. REBELLION PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account) $5,000
    2. TURN LEFT PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account) $1,335

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSUnion PAC · International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers $5,000
    2. NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATIONUnion PAC · National Education Association $5,000
    3. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEUnion PAC · International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers $5,000

    Where the money went $2.0M in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $2.0M of the $2.9M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 15% $308K
    • Consultants & strategy 10% $210K
    • Staff & payroll 8% $150K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 46% $916K
    • Polling, research & data 3% $66K
    • Travel, meals & events 2% $48K
    • Office, technology & overhead 2% $42K
    • Legal & compliance 6% $112K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.2% $4,046
    • Other or unclassified 8% $156K

    Largest payees

    1. SWITCHBOARD $243K
    2. RMS GROUP $153K
    3. RIPPLE EFFECT $101K
    4. FACEBOOK $100K
    5. SNJ STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS $91K

    Paid to individuals: $388K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Feb 16, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (1,158 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $5,737
    Spent
    $1,195
    Cash on hand
    $38K
    • Individuals 100% $5,737

    Campaign totals through Mar 31, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. ALMA ADAMS FOR CONGRESSCandidate committee $500

    No itemized operating expenditures from this candidate's principal campaign committee are in the FEC bulk file yet.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Lent Christopher Carr II, Tita L Hunter-Herod, Loren David Bibler.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.