Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

Nebraska U.S. Senate

8 filings report $23M raised, and outside groups reported $1.5M in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
Pete RickettsRepublican · Filed as incumbent$12M23%16%60%$14M$1.2M$784K$431
Dan OsbornIndependent · Filed as challenger$11M97%2%<0.1%$9.1M$2.0M$71K$110K
Benjamin E. SasseRepublican · Filed as challenger$49K0%0%0%$396K$2.1M——
Cindy BurbankDE · Filed as challenger$49K100%0%0%$26K$23K$422K—
Mike MarvinOther · Filed as challenger$28K100%0%0%$28K$0$73K—
William ForbesDemocrat · Filed as challenger$1,0000%0%100%$1,000$0—$63K
Charles ConboyOther · Filed as challenger$0———$88$-88——
Robin RichardsOther · Filed as challenger$0———$0$0——

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

  • COMMON DEFENSE ACTION FUNDHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries$286K for Cindy Burbank · $73K for Mike Marvin · $63K against William Forbes
  • FELLOWSHIP PACSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries$350K for Pete Ricketts
  • DEFENDING OUR VALUES PACSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries$263K for Pete Ricketts
  • SLF PACSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries$157K for Pete Ricketts · $100K against Dan Osborn
  • NEBRASKA DEMOCRATIC PARTYDemocratic party committeeSpent mainly in primaries$136K for Cindy Burbank
  • PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECTHybrid PAC (super PAC account)98% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$48K for Dan Osborn
  • THOMAS PAINE SOCIETY L.L.C.Filer that is not a political committee91% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$21K for Dan Osborn
  • CLUB FOR GROWTH PACMembership group PAC · Club For GrowthSpent mainly in primaries$15K for Pete Ricketts
  • RED SENATESuper PAC87% of its general-election spending helped Republicans or opposed Democrats$9,999 against Dan Osborn
  • LGBTQ CONNECTION PACSuper PAC98% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$1,301 for Dan Osborn

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · Pete Ricketts

    In the U.S. Senate (NE) since 2023 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 16 of the 16 key Senate floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 4 committees: Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Budget, Environment and Public Works, Foreign Relations · 9 subcommittees
    • 273 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 5 committees reported outside spending for or against them

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (S6NE00129) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $12M
    Spent
    $14M
    Cash on hand
    $1.2M
    • Individuals 23% $2.9M
    • PACs & other committees 16% $1.9M
    • Party committees 0.5% $62K
    • Candidate's own money & loans 60% $7.3M
    • Other receipts 0.7% $80K

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $2.3M moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $784K supporting · $431 opposing ($5,066 of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. FELLOWSHIP PACSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $350K
    2. DEFENDING OUR VALUES PACSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $263K
    3. SLF PACSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $157K

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. INDIGO PACSuper PAC $431

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. NRSCRepublican party committee $62K
    2. NATIONAL RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION PAC (RESTAURANT PAC)Membership group PAC · National Restaurant Association $10K
    3. NCTA - THE INTERNET & TELEVISION ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NCTAPAC)Trade association PAC $10K

    Where the money went $4.7M in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $4.7M of the $14M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 54% $2.6M
    • Consultants & strategy 6% $259K
    • Staff & payroll 10% $485K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 13% $607K
    • Polling, research & data 4% $202K
    • Travel, meals & events 4% $192K
    • Office, technology & overhead 2% $109K
    • Legal & compliance 5% $256K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.1% $5,123
    • Other or unclassified 0.8% $40K

    Largest payees

    1. AXMEDIA $2.2M
    2. AXIOM STRATEGIES $275K
    3. JBEST & COMPANY $209K
    4. FUNDRAISING, INC. $168K
    5. SOCKO STRATEGIES LLC $147K

    Paid to individuals: $440K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 2, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (897 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $11M
    Spent
    $9.1M
    Cash on hand
    $2.0M
    Debts
    $25K
    • Individuals 97% $11M
    • PACs & other committees 2% $230K
    • Party committees <0.1% $200
    • Candidate's own money & loans <0.1% $11
    • Other receipts 0.5% $54K

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $171K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $71K supporting · $110K opposing ($181K of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECTHybrid PAC (super PAC account)98% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $48K
    2. THOMAS PAINE SOCIETY L.L.C.Filer that is not a political committee91% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $21K
    3. LGBTQ CONNECTION PACSuper PAC98% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $1,301

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. SLF PACSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $100K
    2. RED SENATESuper PAC87% of its general-election spending helped Republicans or opposed Democrats $9,999

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATIONUnion PAC · National Education Association $10K
    2. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUEUnion PAC · International Association Of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail And Transportation Workers $10K
    3. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL ACTIONHybrid PAC (super PAC account) $10K

    Where the money went $7.4M in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $7.4M of the $9.1M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Sep 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 41% $3.0M
    • Consultants & strategy 6% $435K
    • Staff & payroll 20% $1.5M
    • Fundraising & processing fees 17% $1.3M
    • Polling, research & data 6% $426K
    • Travel, meals & events 2% $162K
    • Office, technology & overhead 3% $229K
    • Legal & compliance 4% $330K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.1% $5,000
    • Other or unclassified 1% $78K

    Largest payees

    1. OF INDEPENDENCE $1.8M
    2. DIGITAL STRATEGY GROUP $1.1M
    3. PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING $1.0M
    4. FDM CONNECTS $583K
    5. HELIX CAMPAIGNS $514K

    Paid to individuals: $122K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Apr 7, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (1,874 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $49K
    Spent
    $396K
    Cash on hand
    $2.1M
    • Other receipts 100% $49K

    Campaign totals through Sep 30, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $222K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $222K of the $396K the campaign reported spending through Sep 30, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 9, 2026.

    • Office, technology & overhead 0.5% $1,026
    • Legal & compliance 3% $6,230
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 87% $193K
    • Other or unclassified 10% $22K

    Largest payees

    1. AMERICA 101 $193K
    2. AMERICAN EXPRESS $22K
    3. AXCAPITAL, LLC $5,730
    4. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $1,026
    5. SAME DAY PROCESSING $500

    Payments dated Jan 6, 2025 to Jun 9, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (19 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $49K
    Spent
    $26K
    Cash on hand
    $23K
    • Individuals 100% $49K

    Campaign totals through Sep 30, 2026.

    Outside groups: $422K supporting · $0 opposing

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. COMMON DEFENSE ACTION FUNDHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $286K
    2. NEBRASKA DEMOCRATIC PARTYDemocratic party committeeSpent mainly in primaries $136K

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. DEMOCRACY ENGINE, INC., PACCorporate PAC · Democracy Engine, Inc. $19K

    Where the money went $19K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $19K of the $26K the campaign reported spending through Sep 30, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 4% $725
    • Travel, meals & events 9% $1,589
    • Office, technology & overhead 69% $13K
    • Legal & compliance 16% $3,000
    • Other or unclassified 2% $408

    Largest payees

    1. SCALE TO WIN $3,135
    2. INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS: POLITICAL $2,803
    3. BRUSHFIRE $1,063
    4. DEMOCRACY ENGINE, INC., PAC $781
    5. ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES $654

    Paid to individuals: $10K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Apr 2, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (25 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $28K
    Spent
    $28K
    Cash on hand
    $0
    • Individuals 100% $28K

    Campaign totals through Sep 11, 2026.

    Outside groups: $73K supporting · $0 opposing

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. COMMON DEFENSE ACTION FUNDHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $73K

    Where the money went $25K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $25K of the $28K the campaign reported spending through Sep 11, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Sep 4, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 45% $11K
    • Consultants & strategy 15% $3,750
    • Fundraising & processing fees 3% $637
    • Polling, research & data 6% $1,500
    • Office, technology & overhead 4% $900
    • Legal & compliance 26% $6,410
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 2% $516

    Largest payees

    1. HIGHPOINT CAMPAIGNS $4,000
    2. BELL COMPLIANCE LLC $3,845
    3. GOOGLE, INC $3,375
    4. SCALE TO WIN $2,338
    5. L2, INC $900

    Paid to individuals: $7,815, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Mar 2, 2026 to Sep 4, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (32 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $1,000
    Spent
    $1,000
    Cash on hand
    $0
    • Candidate's own money & loans 100% $1,000

    Campaign totals through May 21, 2026.

    Outside groups: $0 supporting · $63K opposing

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. COMMON DEFENSE ACTION FUNDHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $63K

    Where the money went $1,000 in itemized spending

    • Advertising & outreach 100% $1,000

    Paid to individuals: $1,000, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Apr 22, 2026 to Apr 22, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (1 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $0
    Spent
    $88
    Cash on hand
    $-88

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    No itemized operating expenditures from this candidate's principal campaign committee are in the FEC bulk file yet.

  • Raised
    $0
    Spent
    $0
    Cash on hand
    $0

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    No itemized operating expenditures from this candidate's principal campaign committee are in the FEC bulk file yet.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Mac Stevens, Edward Dunn, Debra Leanne Axtell Schultz, Gavin Solomon.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.