Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

New York U.S. House District 3

4 filings report $9.4M raised, and outside groups reported $213K in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · Filed as incumbent$7.4M70%28%0%$6.4M$3.2M$1,375$210K
Mike LipetriRepublican · Filed as challenger$1.2M70%29%0%$2.1M$457K—$30
Gregory HachRepublican · Filed as challenger$718K4%0%96%$727K$635——
Danielle WelchDemocrat · Filed as challenger$50K98%0%2%$50K$0$1,309—

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

  • CLFHybrid PAC (super PAC account)99% of its general-election spending helped Republicans or opposed Democrats$210K against Thomas Suozzi
  • SURJ PACPAC with no sponsoring organization$1,309 for Danielle Welch
  • ACTIVATE AMERICASuper PAC99% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$1,255 for Thomas Suozzi
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTESSuper PACAll of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$30 for Thomas Suozzi · $30 against Mike Lipetri
  • GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTIONSuper PAC$53 for Thomas Suozzi
  • NYIC POLITICAL ACTION FUNDSuper PAC$27 for Thomas Suozzi
  • SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTIONSuper PAC$10 for Thomas Suozzi

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · Thomas R. Suozzi

    In the U.S. House (NY-3) since 2024 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 23 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 2 committees: Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party, Ways and Means · 2 subcommittees
    • 430 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 5 committees reported outside spending for or against them

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H6NY03247) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $7.4M
    Spent
    $6.4M
    Cash on hand
    $3.2M
    • Individuals 70% $5.1M
    • PACs & other committees 28% $2.0M
    • Party committees <0.1% $5,176
    • Other receipts 2% $182K

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $239K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $1,375 supporting · $210K opposing ($210K of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. ACTIVATE AMERICASuper PAC99% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $1,255
    2. GIVEGREEN UNITED ACTIONSuper PAC $53
    3. PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTESSuper PACAll of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $30

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. CLFHybrid PAC (super PAC account)99% of its general-election spending helped Republicans or opposed Democrats $210K

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEPAC with no sponsoring organization $10K
    2. CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERSUnion PAC · United Brotherhood Of Carpenters And Joiners Of America $10K
    3. COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA - COPE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEEUnion PAC · Communications Workers Of America $10K

    Where the money went $1.7M in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $1.7M of the $6.4M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 17% $304K
    • Consultants & strategy 16% $269K
    • Staff & payroll 9% $149K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 29% $512K
    • Polling, research & data 4% $65K
    • Travel, meals & events 2% $30K
    • Office, technology & overhead 7% $118K
    • Legal & compliance 7% $115K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.1% $2,409
    • Other or unclassified 10% $175K

    Largest payees

    1. BERGER HIRSCHBERG STRATEGIES $211K
    2. THE PARKSIDE GROUP LLC $189K
    3. PAYROLL DATA PROCESSING, INC. $144K
    4. VISA $138K
    5. FH STRATEGIES LLC $104K

    Paid to individuals: $67K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 6, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (743 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $1.2M
    Spent
    $2.1M
    Cash on hand
    $457K
    Debts
    $49K
    • Individuals 70% $852K
    • PACs & other committees 29% $360K
    • Party committees 0.7% $8,200
    • Other receipts 0.2% $1,849

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $1.4M moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $0 supporting · $30 opposing

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTESSuper PACAll of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $30

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. CONSERVATIVE OPPORTUNITY LEADERSHIP AND ENTERPRISE PACLeadership PAC of Tom Cole $10K
    2. THE EYE OF THE TIGER POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEELeadership PAC of Steve Scalise $10K
    3. NO NONSENSE PACPAC with no sponsoring organization $10K

    Where the money went $847K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $847K of the $2.1M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 70% $590K
    • Consultants & strategy 5% $40K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 19% $161K
    • Polling, research & data 0.6% $5,217
    • Travel, meals & events 2% $20K
    • Office, technology & overhead <0.1% $361
    • Legal & compliance 4% $31K
    • Other or unclassified <0.1% $266

    Largest payees

    1. FLEXPOINT CAMPAIGNS $350K
    2. CERBERUS $102K
    3. FULFILLMENT SOLUTIONS INC $62K
    4. CCC ENTERPRISES $47K
    5. EUPORIE $33K

    Paid to individuals: $32K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Feb 6, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (114 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $718K
    Spent
    $727K
    Cash on hand
    $635
    Debts
    $898K
    • Individuals 4% $31K
    • Candidate's own money & loans 96% $688K

    Campaign totals through Sep 30, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $726K in itemized spending

    • Advertising & outreach 55% $396K
    • Consultants & strategy 16% $119K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 4% $32K
    • Polling, research & data 4% $26K
    • Travel, meals & events 0.1% $500
    • Legal & compliance 21% $152K

    Largest payees

    1. THE WAVERLY GROUP $274K
    2. EXPRESS CANVASSING, LLC $126K
    3. ANCHOR CITY STRATEGIES $73K
    4. HARRIS MEDIA, LLC $54K
    5. THE NOVEMBER TEAM $45K

    Paid to individuals: $7,500, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Nov 4, 2025 to Aug 5, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (101 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $50K
    Spent
    $50K
    Cash on hand
    $0
    • Individuals 98% $49K
    • Candidate's own money & loans 2% $852

    Campaign totals through Jun 30, 2026.

    Outside groups: $1,309 supporting · $0 opposing

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. SURJ PACPAC with no sponsoring organization $1,309

    Where the money went $49K in itemized spending

    • Advertising & outreach 0.9% $450
    • Consultants & strategy 41% $20K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 4% $1,793
    • Polling, research & data 3% $1,496
    • Legal & compliance 52% $25K

    Largest payees

    1. LEGION CONSULTING, LLC $17K
    2. SPRUCE STREET CONSULTING, LLC $15K
    3. THE LAW OFFICE OF ALI NAJMI $10K
    4. BOROUGH STRATEGIES, LLC $3,698
    5. ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES $1,793

    Paid to individuals: $1,302, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Feb 22, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (35 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Michael Joseph Lavery.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.