Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

Oklahoma U.S. House District 5

4 filings report $2.9M raised, and outside groups reported $394K in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
Stephanie BiceRepublican · Filed as incumbent$1.9M34%65%0%$2.4M$1.1M——
Jena NelsonDemocrat · Filed as challenger$822K97%3%0%$713K$109K——
Trey MartinDemocrat · Filed as challenger$115K87%12%0.9%$115K$0$394K—
Robert Patrick HenriIndependent · Filed as challenger$6,3612%0%98%$4,689$1,672——

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · Stephanie I. Bice

    In the U.S. House (OK-5) since 2021 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 24 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 2 committees: Administration, Appropriations · 4 subcommittees
    • 291 committees reported contributions to them this cycle

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H0OK05205) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $1.9M
    Spent
    $2.4M
    Cash on hand
    $1.1M
    • Individuals 34% $664K
    • PACs & other committees 65% $1.3M
    • Other receipts 1% $25K

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $528K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC)Trade association PAC · American Bankers Association (aba) $10K
    2. AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS PACTrade association PAC · America'S Credit Unions $10K
    3. NATIONAL COTTON COUNCIL OF AMERICA COMMITTEE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COTTONTrade association PAC · National Cotton Council Of America $10K

    Where the money went $833K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $833K of the $2.4M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 4% $35K
    • Consultants & strategy 21% $177K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 37% $309K
    • Polling, research & data 5% $39K
    • Travel, meals & events 6% $52K
    • Office, technology & overhead 4% $36K
    • Legal & compliance 14% $113K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 4% $33K
    • Other or unclassified 5% $38K

    Largest payees

    1. 814 CONSULTING $211K
    2. LILLY & COMPANY $86K
    3. K&H ACCOUNTING PARTNERS PC $54K
    4. BROGHAMER COMPLIANCE $48K
    5. LIMESTONE STRATEGIES $45K

    Paid to individuals: $24K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 2, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (710 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $822K
    Spent
    $713K
    Cash on hand
    $109K
    • Individuals 97% $793K
    • PACs & other committees 3% $23K
    • Other receipts 0.7% $6,160

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEUnion PAC · International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers $2,500
    2. NEA FUND FOR CHILDREN AND PUBLIC EDUCATIONUnion PAC · National Education Association $2,000
    3. DEMOCRACY SUMMER LEADERSHIP PACLeadership PAC of Jamie Raskin $2,000

    Where the money went $428K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $428K of the $713K the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 9% $39K
    • Consultants & strategy 8% $33K
    • Staff & payroll 52% $224K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 18% $77K
    • Polling, research & data 0.7% $3,100
    • Travel, meals & events 2% $6,992
    • Office, technology & overhead 9% $37K
    • Legal & compliance 0.2% $650
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.2% $1,000
    • Other or unclassified 1% $5,656

    Largest payees

    1. BISON STRATEGIES $55K
    2. GRASSROOTS ANALYTICS INC. $31K
    3. BERGER HIRSCHBERG STRATEGIES $22K
    4. ACTBLUE $13K
    5. NEW BLUE INTERACTIVE $13K

    Paid to individuals: $221K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jul 10, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (342 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $115K
    Spent
    $115K
    Cash on hand
    $0
    • Individuals 87% $101K
    • PACs & other committees 12% $14K
    • Candidate's own money & loans 0.9% $1,000

    Campaign totals through Sep 30, 2026.

    Outside groups: $394K supporting · $0 opposing

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. LEAGUE OF LABOR VOTERSHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $394K

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. WAY BACK PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account) $5,000
    2. LEAGUE OF LABOR VOTERSHybrid PAC (super PAC account) $5,000
    3. INT'L ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRON WORKERS (IPAL)Union PAC · Int'L Association Of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental And Reinforcing Iron Workers $2,500

    Where the money went $115K in itemized spending

    • Advertising & outreach 70% $80K
    • Consultants & strategy 2% $2,000
    • Fundraising & processing fees 23% $27K
    • Polling, research & data 1% $1,333
    • Office, technology & overhead 2% $2,743
    • Legal & compliance 2% $2,171

    Largest payees

    1. DEBRA SCHOMMER MEDIA GROUP $50K
    2. SOLIDARITY STRATEGIES $15K
    3. SCALE TO WIN $10K
    4. RIPPLE EFFECT STRATEGIES LLC $8,808
    5. B26 $8,088

    Paid to individuals: $2,255, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Apr 2, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (53 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $6,361
    Spent
    $4,689
    Cash on hand
    $1,672
    • Individuals 2% $150
    • Candidate's own money & loans 98% $6,211

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $3,543 in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $3,543 of the $4,689 the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Sep 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 27% $945
    • Office, technology & overhead 45% $1,598
    • Legal & compliance 28% $1,000

    Largest payees

    1. SECRETARY OF THE STATE ELECTION BOARD $1,000

    Paid to individuals: $2,543, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Apr 1, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (5 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Austin Nieves.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.