Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

Pennsylvania U.S. House District 6

2 filings report $2.5M raised, and outside groups reported $127 in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Filed as incumbent$2.1M60%33%0%$1.3M$4.1M$105$22
Martin YoungRepublican · Filed as challenger$459K77%1%22%$358K$102K——

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · Chrissy Houlahan

    In the U.S. House (PA-6) since 2019 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 24 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 2 committees: Armed Services, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence · 4 subcommittees
    • 192 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 2 committees reported outside spending for or against them

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H8PA06087) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $2.1M
    Spent
    $1.3M
    Cash on hand
    $4.1M
    • Individuals 60% $1.2M
    • PACs & other committees 33% $683K
    • Other receipts 8% $158K

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $911 moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $105 supporting · $22 opposing ($117 of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. API PA VOTESSuper PAC $95
    2. SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTIONSuper PAC $10

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. PENNSYLVANIA PRO-LIFE FEDERATION PACMembership group PAC · Pennsylvania Pro-Life Federation, Inc. $22

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSUnion PAC · International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers $10K
    2. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L EUnion PAC · American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio $10K
    3. UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PAC (UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING & PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA)Union PAC · Plumbers & Steamfitters Local 22 PAC Inc $10K

    Where the money went $746K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $746K of the $1.3M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 5% $38K
    • Consultants & strategy 32% $240K
    • Staff & payroll 1% $8,895
    • Fundraising & processing fees 35% $261K
    • Travel, meals & events 4% $27K
    • Office, technology & overhead 10% $76K
    • Legal & compliance 13% $94K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.1% $1,000
    • Other or unclassified <0.1% $41

    Largest payees

    1. HM CONSULTING $226K
    2. ANNE LEWIS STRATEGIES, LLC $118K
    3. CAPITOL COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATES $71K
    4. ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES $32K
    5. NGP VAN, INC. $25K

    Paid to individuals: $134K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 2, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (428 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $459K
    Spent
    $358K
    Cash on hand
    $102K
    Debts
    $25K
    • Individuals 77% $353K
    • PACs & other committees 1% $5,546
    • Candidate's own money & loans 22% $100K
    • Other receipts 0.1% $594

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. KEYSTONE FEDERAL PACPAC with no sponsoring organization $1,000

    Where the money went $186K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $186K of the $358K the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 10% $19K
    • Consultants & strategy 45% $83K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 9% $17K
    • Polling, research & data 4% $7,500
    • Travel, meals & events 2% $3,800
    • Office, technology & overhead 5% $10K
    • Legal & compliance 4% $8,155
    • Other or unclassified 20% $37K

    Largest payees

    1. INTELLZ $81K
    2. FACEBOOK/META $10K
    3. WINRED $8,336
    4. HUCKABY DAVIS LISKER $8,155
    5. ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL INC $6,678

    Paid to individuals: $49K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jul 7, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (124 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Benjamin Popp, Philip Vincent Cerroni.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.