2026 race · follow the money
Pennsylvania U.S. House District 15
2 filings report $2.3M raised, and outside groups reported $3,721 in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.
The count.
Checking the election sources…
Side by side.
Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.
| Candidate | Raised | Individuals | PACs | Own money | Spent | Cash | Outside for | Outside against |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Filed as incumbent | $2.1M | 42% | 57% | 0% | $2.2M | $704K | $22 | $2,318 |
| Raymond Allen BilgerDemocrat · Filed as challenger | $231K | 95% | 4% | 0.5% | $142K | $89K | $1,359 | $22 |
Who spent from outside.
The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.
- RURAL FREEDOM NETWORK$1,359 for Raymond Allen Bilger · $530 against Glenn Thompson
- MAHA PAC$1,788 against Glenn Thompson
- PENNSYLVANIA PRO-LIFE FEDERATION PAC$22 for Glenn Thompson · $22 against Raymond Allen Bilger
Each campaign.
Sitting member of Congress · Glenn Thompson
In the U.S. House (PA-15) since 2009 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027
- Recorded yea or nay on 23 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
- 2 committees: Agriculture (Chair), Education and Workforce · 2 subcommittees
- 261 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 1 committee reported outside spending for or against them
Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H8PA05071) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.
- Raised
- $2.1M
- Spent
- $2.2M
- Cash on hand
- $704K
- Individuals 42% $882K
- PACs & other committees 57% $1.2M
- Other receipts 0.1% $2,894
Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $74K moved between the candidate's own committees.
Outside groups: $22 supporting · $2,318 opposing ($552 of it designated for the general election)
Biggest spenders supporting
Biggest spenders opposing
- MAHA PAC $1,788
- RURAL FREEDOM NETWORK $530
Largest direct PAC contributions
Where the money went $1.1M in itemized spending
These itemized payments cover $1.1M of the $2.2M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.
- Advertising & outreach 11% $120K
- Consultants & strategy 5% $54K
- Staff & payroll 15% $174K
- Fundraising & processing fees 41% $463K
- Travel, meals & events 18% $200K
- Office, technology & overhead 2% $27K
- Legal & compliance 6% $66K
- Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.2% $1,900
- Other or unclassified 3% $28K
Largest payees
- DISTRICT CITY CONSULTING $368K
- GUSTO $174K
- CFS COMPLIANCE $61K
- HEMLOCK DIGITAL STRATEGIES LLC $54K
- DAVID BRENT CONSULTANTS, INC. $53K
Paid to individuals: $58K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.
Payments dated Jan 3, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (807 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗
Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.
- Raised
- $231K
- Spent
- $142K
- Cash on hand
- $89K
- Individuals 95% $219K
- PACs & other committees 4% $8,300
- Party committees 0.2% $500
- Candidate's own money & loans 0.5% $1,100
- Other receipts 1.0% $2,205
Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.
Outside groups: $1,359 supporting · $22 opposing
Biggest spenders supporting
- RURAL FREEDOM NETWORK $1,359
Biggest spenders opposing
Largest direct PAC contributions
Where the money went $51K in itemized spending
These itemized payments cover $51K of the $142K the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.
- Advertising & outreach 6% $2,811
- Consultants & strategy 30% $15K
- Fundraising & processing fees 5% $2,491
- Polling, research & data 14% $7,118
- Travel, meals & events 7% $3,285
- Office, technology & overhead 0.4% $217
- Legal & compliance 8% $3,967
- Other or unclassified 31% $16K
Largest payees
- PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY $6,005
- ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES $2,491
- EVERYACTION, INC. $1,113
- LAMAR COMPANIES $1,075
- CENTRE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE $620
Paid to individuals: $37K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.
Payments dated Feb 22, 2026 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (59 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗
Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.
Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Jacob A Smith.
Use this race.
Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.
The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide
FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.
