Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

Texas U.S. House District 12

2 filings report $1.2M raised, and outside groups reported $52 in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Filed as incumbent$1.2M37%63%0%$956K$1.5M$52—
Kenneth Morgan-AguileraDemocrat · Filed as challenger$10K35%0%65%$11K$0——

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · Craig A. Goldman

    In the U.S. House (TX-12) since 2025 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 24 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 1 committee: Energy and Commerce · 3 subcommittees
    • 209 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 1 committee reported outside spending for or against them

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H4TX12065) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $1.2M
    Spent
    $956K
    Cash on hand
    $1.5M
    • Individuals 37% $430K
    • PACs & other committees 63% $727K
    • Other receipts <0.1% $11

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $776K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $52 supporting · $0 opposing

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR LIFE FED PACSuper PAC $52

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (RJC-PAC)Membership group PAC · Republican Jewish Coalition $11K
    2. NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NCBA-PAC)Trade association PAC · National Cattlemen'S Beef Association $10K
    3. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEMembership group PAC · National Association Of Realtors $10K

    Where the money went $764K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $764K of the $956K the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 4% $27K
    • Consultants & strategy 25% $188K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 41% $309K
    • Travel, meals & events 4% $33K
    • Office, technology & overhead 3% $20K
    • Legal & compliance 0.5% $3,688
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 2% $12K
    • Other or unclassified 23% $172K

    Largest payees

    1. LILLY & COMPANY $291K
    2. AMERICAN EXPRESS $171K
    3. DUDLEY GROUP LLC $35K
    4. CMDI $18K
    5. SOUTHWESTERN EXPOSITION & LIVESTOCK SHOW $18K

    Paid to individuals: $189K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 2, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (133 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $10K
    Spent
    $11K
    Cash on hand
    $0
    • Individuals 35% $3,650
    • Candidate's own money & loans 65% $6,700

    Campaign totals through Mar 3, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $9,673 in itemized spending

    • Advertising & outreach 54% $5,266
    • Consultants & strategy 5% $515
    • Fundraising & processing fees 3% $310
    • Travel, meals & events 3% $256
    • Office, technology & overhead 34% $3,327

    Largest payees

    1. TEXAS DEMOCRATIC PARTY-AUSTIN $5,325
    2. ADVANCED INTEGRATED MARKETING INC $2,830
    3. YOUR SIGNS WORLD $507
    4. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE $316
    5. GRASSROOTS ANALYTICS,INC $250

    Payments dated Aug 14, 2025 to Feb 8, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (12 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Brian James Sprague, Semaj Swire, Angela Rodriguez Prilliman, Gavin Solomon.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.