Skip to content
Hugin

Hugin election desk / November 3, 2026

The count, in context.

Follow reported results, then follow the public record behind the people and questions on your ballot.

Connecting to sources
Unofficial results. Counting and canvassing can change the numbers.

A lead is not a winner. Even 100% of precincts reporting does not mean every ballot has been counted. Missing races are not zero votes.

How results become official ↗

Reported results

Across the states

Checking the election sources…

Before the next vote

Know what's on your ballot.

State selection is a starting point, not a personalized ballot. Your election office can confirm the contests and measures for your address.

Those sites handle their own address requests. Hugin does not ask for your address on this page.

The work behind the name

Follow the record.

Compare what someone said and did: votes, sponsorships, campaign money, public roles and documented findings. Check dates, sources and responses, and use the same questions for everyone.

Campaign contributions and independent spending are different records. A connection alone does not establish influence, motive or wrongdoing. Search can find people with similar names, so confirm an identity before connecting records. A missing record is not a verdict.

Questions to ask of every candidate
  1. What did they do? Find the original action, its date and the person's actual role. House votes ↗ · Senate votes ↗
  2. Who funded the campaign? Check the filer, office, reporting period and type of money. Federal campaign filings ↗
  3. What do they say? Compare their own statements with the record and consider their response to a finding. A candidate may have no voting record if they have not held office.

Federal records cover federal offices; state and local campaigns use different filing systems. A filing alone does not establish ballot qualification.

Sources, coverage & refresh

Counts are read directly from Arizona, California, Delaware, Idaho, Utah and Washington election offices when available. Other displayed counts, including fallbacks, come from official state election offices via The People's Tally, adapted by Hugin under CC BY 4.0. Hugin has not independently verified every count. State election-office links are sourced from USAGov.

Coverage is incomplete and varies by contest. We do not import race calls, predictions or inferred winners. Some sources do not provide an update time. State and congressional boundaries can change; this page does not color district boundaries from these counts.

The board checks for changes every three minutes while open. The Idaho, Utah and Washington source responses are normally cached for 15 minutes, and an election office can report less often. The board check time is not the same as the source update time.

Follow the money / 2026 House & Senate

Where the outside money went.

Super PACs, parties and other groups reported $958M in independent spending for or against named congressional candidates this cycle, primaries included. These are the seats where the most of it landed.

  1. 01

    Michigan · U.S. Senate

    $80M in outside spending · $14M designated for the general election

    FEC ↗
  2. 02

    Texas · U.S. Senate

    $64M in outside spending · $1.4M designated for the general election

    FEC ↗
  3. 04

    Kentucky · U.S. Senate

    $39M in outside spending

    FEC ↗
  4. 06

    Iowa · U.S. Senate

    $25M in outside spending · $14M designated for the general election

    FEC ↗
  5. 07

    Illinois · U.S. Senate

    $25M in outside spending

    FEC ↗
  6. 08

    Louisiana · U.S. Senate

    $25M in outside spending

    FEC ↗
  7. 09

    Alabama · U.S. Senate

    $23M in outside spending · $85K designated for the general election

    FEC ↗
  8. 10

    Minnesota · U.S. Senate

    $20M in outside spending · $399K designated for the general election

    FEC ↗
  9. 11

    North Carolina · U.S. Senate

    $17M in outside spending · $14M designated for the general election

    FEC ↗
  10. 12

    California · U.S. House District 22

    $16M in outside spending · $7.8M designated for the general election

    FEC ↗

Independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, read November 4, 2026; each candidate's totals run through their latest processed report. Late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included, so the real totals are higher. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate. Spending against a candidate counts toward that candidate's seat. A dollar figure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.