Skip to content
Hugin

The archive

Search the record.

Reporting, commentary and the evidence behind the story.

Published records

1–8 of 8 matches

  1. Case file

    Epstein Public Records Accountability File

    …H.R. 4405 Epstein Files Transparency Act bill record (Library of Congress / Congress.gov). Official legislative record for H.R. 4405, the Epstein Files Transparency Act,…

    Read record summary

    A public-record case file for official Epstein-related prosecutions, court records, custody oversight, records-release review, civil enforcement records, and state investigation updates. It is designed to preserve source-backed facts and open questions without turning association, internet speculation, or incomplete records into misconduct claims.

    Matched in source, case details

  2. Case file

    STOCK Act News Correlation Accountability File

    …windows used only as coverage context. In scope: Congress.gov bills, members, and actions once a server-side key is configured. In scope: Explicit review queues for ticker normalization,…

    Read record summary

    A public-record case file for correlating official House and Senate financial disclosures with source-diverse news clusters, SEC issuer reference data, SEC filings, and congressional action dates. It treats timing overlap as a review question, not evidence of insider trading or corruption.

    Matched in case details

  3. Case file

    Pandemic-Relief Fraud Accountability File

    …programs and the origin of the widely cited figure of more than $200 billion. SBA-OIG estimated more than $200 billion in potentially fraudulent COVID-19 EIDL and PPP loans. The estimate equals at least 17…

    Read record summary

    A public-record case file for federal enforcement and oversight of pandemic-relief fraud across the Paycheck Protection Program, COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loans, and expanded Unemployment Insurance from 2020 to 2026. It keeps oversight estimates, audit findings, criminal dispositions, and administrative referrals separate, treats fraud and improper-payment estimates as program-integrity figures rather than adjudicated losses, and treats charges as allegations until adjudicated.

    Matched in case details

  4. News

    The Supreme Court's first argument week, October 5 to 7, is four cases about whether a lawsuit can go forward: what a 401(k) lawsuit must allege, which court hears a veteran's constitutional claim, whether federal law bars Boulder's state-law climate suit against two oil companies, and when a Guam group can challenge the Air Force's bid to keep detonating old munitions in the open. The federal government's lawyers argue against the side that sued in all four.

    …Court hears the first arguments of its new term. On the line are claims brought by workers who saved in Intel's retirement plans, an Army veteran whose disability pay was cut, the city and county of Boulder,…

    Read record summary

    The Supreme Court's new term opens with four arguments on October 5, 6 and 7, and each turns, at least in part, on whether a lawsuit can go forward rather than on who is right about the facts. On October 5 the Court hears Suncor Energy v. Commissioners of Boulder County (No. 25-170), on whether federal law bars Boulder's state-law climate damages claims against Suncor and Exxon Mobil, and whether the Court has jurisdiction at all; then Johnson v. United States Congress (No. 25-735), on whether veterans can challenge a benefits law's constitutionality in federal district court. On October 6, Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee (No. 25-498) asks whether a lawsuit over underperforming funds in Intel's retirement plans, including its 401(k), must identify a 'meaningful benchmark'. On October 7, Department of the Air Force v. Prutehi Guahan (No. 25-579) asks whether the Air Force's application to renew a hazardous-waste permit on Guam can be challenged now, and whether environmental review had to come first. The federal government's lawyers argue against the side that sued in all four. Arguments begin at 10 a.m. Washington time, and the Court live-streams the audio.

    Matched in article text

  5. News

    A federal judge called the Justice Department's reason for not reviewing foreign-language Epstein records 'without merit' and set a September 24 deadline to start. The Department appealed a second time, the deadline is on hold, and no filing has yet given a count of those documents.

    …judge decided The case is Phang v. Blanche (No. 1:26-cv-01417, D.D.C.), brought under the Administrative Procedure Act by the journalist Katie Phang against Attorney General Todd Blanche in his official…

    Read record summary

    On September 16, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled in Phang v. Blanche that the Justice Department's reason for not reviewing foreign-language records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, that first-level review was 'not practicable', is without merit, and ordered the review started, with notice, by September 24. He also rejected the Department's reason for withholding handwritten FBI interview notes and ordered them submitted for private review. The Department appealed a second time (D.C. Circuit No. 26-5334, consolidated with No. 26-5299). On September 21 the judge denied its request for a partial stay but put the foreign-language deadline on hold while the appeals court decides the Department's stay request; the Department's reply there is due Tuesday, September 29 at 4:00 p.m. The Department's January 30 letter counted more than 6 million pages identified as potentially responsive and nearly 3.5 million released, but gave no count of foreign-language pages. Asked on August 13 how many documents were involved, the Department's lawyer said he was not sure he had the number. The same week, the House found Leon Black in contempt of Congress.

    Matched in article text

  6. Case file

    Consumer Protection Enforcement Accountability File

    …have skyrocketed from about $600 million in 2020 to approximately $3 billion in 2025. For example, in fiscal year 2026, the FTC returned more than $513 million to consumers of all ages. Sentinel data is…

    Read record summary

    A public-record case file for tracking data-broker, privacy, consumer-finance, civil enforcement, complaint-data, retail-fraud, recall, food-traceability guidance, medical-device controls, breach, communications-enforcement, and healthcare-transparency source lanes. It treats enforcement actions, warning letters, complaint databases, safety regulations, guidance, recall records, breach lists, and investor-protection programs as separate public records rather than proof that any named company or person committed misconduct outside the cited record.

    Matched in case details

  7. Case file

    Public Spending Misuse Accountability File

    Read record summary

    A public-record case file for reviewing federal awards, Treasury outlay context, Inspector General reports, pandemic-spending oversight, and recipient-integrity records. It separates official spending records, audit findings, and credential-gated exclusion checks from claims about waste, fraud, abuse, or misuse.

    …expansion since January 2025. The expansion is funded in part by the $45 billion for detention capacity that Public Law 119-21 provides through fiscal year 2029. GAO concludes ICE 'has wasted funds on…

    Matched in case details

  8. Case file

    Cryptocurrency Fraud Enforcement Accountability File

    …to 25 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and over $11 billion in forfeiture, by U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan. He was previously found guilty of two counts of wire fraud, two counts of…

    Read record summary

    A public-record case file for United States federal cryptocurrency-fraud enforcement from 2023 through 2026, covering DOJ criminal prosecutions, SEC and CFTC civil enforcement, crypto-exchange enforcement, and digital-asset seizure and forfeiture actions. It keeps criminal convictions, civil settlements, dismissals, and charging-stage allegations separate, and records a charge as an allegation until a plea, verdict, or judgment appears in a cited primary source.

    Matched in case details

Searching scanner reports… Published results are ready above.