Arizona U.S. House District 6

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

• CLFHybrid PAC (super PAC account)99% of its general-election spending helped Republicans or opposed Democrats$2.3M against Joanna Mendoza
• HMPHybrid PAC (super PAC account)All of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$2.0M against Juan Ciscomani
• VOTEVETSHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries$553K against Juan Ciscomani
• PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECTHybrid PAC (super PAC account)98% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$99K for Joanna Mendoza
• SPECIAL OPERATIONS FOR AMERICASuper PACSpent mainly in primaries$20K for Juan Ciscomani
• YOUTH SAVE DEMOCRACY PACPAC with no sponsoring organizationSpent mainly in primaries$6,476 against Juan Ciscomani
• INDIVISIBLE PROJECT INC.Filer that is not a political committee$4,256 against Juan Ciscomani · $172 for Joanna Mendoza
• AANHPI RISING TIDESuper PAC$2,364 for Joanna Mendoza
• FIELD TEAM 6, INC.Super PAC99% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$2,183 for Joanna Mendoza
• ACTIVATE AMERICASuper PAC99% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans$1,412 against Juan Ciscomani

Each campaign.

• Joanna MendozaFEC filing: Joanna Mendoza · H6AZ06099 ↗

  Raised

  $10M

  Spent

  $10M

  Cash on hand

  $808K

  • Individuals 92% $9.3M
  • PACs & other committees 8% $798K
  • Party committees <0.1% $5,872
  • Other receipts <0.1% $850

  Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $1.2M moved between the candidate's own committees.

  Outside groups: $104K supporting · $2.3M opposing ($2.4M of it designated for the general election)

  Biggest spenders supporting

  1. PROGRESSIVE TURNOUT PROJECTHybrid PAC (super PAC account)98% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $99K
  2. AANHPI RISING TIDESuper PAC $2,364
  3. FIELD TEAM 6, INC.Super PAC99% of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $2,183

  Biggest spenders opposing

  1. CLFHybrid PAC (super PAC account)99% of its general-election spending helped Republicans or opposed Democrats $2.3M

  Largest direct PAC contributions

  1. EMILYS LISTPAC with no sponsoring organization $24K
  2. SWING LEFTHybrid PAC (super PAC account) $11K
  3. MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSUnion PAC · International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers $10K

  Where the money went $4.0M in itemized spending

  These itemized payments cover $4.0M of the $10M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jul 1, 2026.

  • Advertising & outreach 67% $2.7M
  • Consultants & strategy 0.6% $25K
  • Staff & payroll 18% $715K
  • Fundraising & processing fees 6% $246K
  • Polling, research & data 2% $73K
  • Travel, meals & events 1% $57K
  • Office, technology & overhead 2% $60K
  • Legal & compliance 1% $56K
  • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.3% $14K
  • Other or unclassified 2% $90K

  Largest payees

  1. SCREEN STRATEGIES MEDIA $1.3M
  2. GRASSROOTS ANALYTICS, INC. $1.2M
  3. GUSTO PAYROLL SERVICES $484K
  4. ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES $177K
  5. GUSTO TAX SERVICES $166K

  Paid to individuals: $139K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

  Payments dated Feb 9, 2025 to Jul 1, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (914 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

  Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

• Juan CiscomaniFEC filing: Juan Ciscomani · H2AZ02360 ↗

  Sitting member of Congress · Juan Ciscomani

  In the U.S. House (AZ-6) since 2023 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

  • Recorded yea or nay on 23 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
  • 2 committees: Appropriations, Veterans' Affairs · 5 subcommittees
  • 418 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 6 committees reported outside spending for or against them

  Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H2AZ02360) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

  Raised

  $5.1M

  Spent

  $7.3M

  Cash on hand

  $619K

  • Individuals 59% $3.0M
  • PACs & other committees 40% $2.0M
  • Party committees 0.2% $10K
  • Other receipts 0.2% $10K

  Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $2.6M moved between the candidate's own committees.

  Outside groups: $20K supporting · $2.5M opposing ($2.6M of it designated for the general election)

  Biggest spenders supporting

  1. SPECIAL OPERATIONS FOR AMERICASuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $20K

  Biggest spenders opposing

  1. HMPHybrid PAC (super PAC account)All of its general-election spending helped Democrats or opposed Republicans $2.0M
  2. VOTEVETSHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $553K
  3. YOUTH SAVE DEMOCRACY PACPAC with no sponsoring organizationSpent mainly in primaries $6,476

  Largest direct PAC contributions

  1. BUILD POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS (BUILDPAC)Trade association PAC · National Association Of Home Builders $10K
  2. NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION AMERICA'S ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES PACTrade association PAC · National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (nreca) $10K
  3. AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC)Trade association PAC · American Bankers Association (aba) $10K

  Where the money went $2.2M in itemized spending

  These itemized payments cover $2.2M of the $7.3M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

  • Advertising & outreach 13% $285K
  • Consultants & strategy 15% $331K
  • Fundraising & processing fees 35% $755K
  • Polling, research & data 4% $75K
  • Travel, meals & events 2% $44K
  • Office, technology & overhead 5% $102K
  • Legal & compliance 9% $199K
  • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.1% $2,500
  • Other or unclassified 17% $368K

  Largest payees

  1. ROSE STRATEGIES LLC $337K
  2. TARGETED VICTORY $329K
  3. AMERICAN EXPRESS $287K
  4. MENTZER MEDIA $269K
  5. RJW STRATEGIES LLC $114K

  Paid to individuals: $161K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

  Payments dated Jan 1, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (398 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

  Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

• Chris DonatFEC filing: Chris Donat · H6AZ06107 ↗

  Raised

  $21K

  Spent

  $21K

  Cash on hand

  $0

  • Individuals 92% $19K
  • Candidate's own money & loans 8% $1,753

  Campaign totals through Apr 13, 2026.

  No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

  Where the money went $16K in itemized spending

  These itemized payments cover $16K of the $21K the campaign reported spending through Apr 13, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Mar 23, 2026.

  • Advertising & outreach 12% $2,011
  • Consultants & strategy 35% $5,739
  • Fundraising & processing fees 4% $647
  • Travel, meals & events 15% $2,370
  • Office, technology & overhead 7% $1,108
  • Other or unclassified 27% $4,331

  Largest payees

  1. PIMA COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY $2,000
  2. VISTAPRINT $1,092
  3. GLOO FACTORY INK. $858
  4. ALLIANCE BANK OF ARIZONA $645
  5. LIBRA LABS, LLC $500

  Paid to individuals: $9,332, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

  Payments dated Jan 21, 2025 to Mar 23, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (48 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

  Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

• Trevor DickersonFEC filing: Trevor Dickerson · H6AZ06115 ↗

  Raised

  $19K

  Spent

  $13K

  Cash on hand

  $5,576

  Debts

  $15K

  • Individuals 24% $4,723
  • Candidate's own money & loans 76% $15K

  Campaign totals through Sep 30, 2025.

  No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

  Where the money went $8,205 in itemized spending

  These itemized payments cover $8,205 of the $13K the campaign reported spending through Sep 30, 2025. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Sep 23, 2025.

  • Advertising & outreach 34% $2,799
  • Office, technology & overhead 30% $2,477
  • Legal & compliance 36% $2,930

  Largest payees

  1. MUNGER DENKER RUIZ BARBOUR PLLC $2,930
  2. ECANVASSER $2,118
  3. MILES LABEL COMPANY $799
  4. SIGNS ON THE CHEAP $782
  5. FACEBOOK $778

  Payments dated Apr 10, 2025 to Sep 23, 2025, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (12 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

  Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

• Jereme Lance PetersFEC filing: Jereme Lance Peters · H6AZ06214 ↗

  Raised

  $11K

  Spent

  $11K

  Cash on hand

  $0

  • Individuals 100% $11K

  Campaign totals through Mar 31, 2026.

  No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

  No itemized operating expenditures from this candidate's principal campaign committee are in the FEC bulk file yet.

• Iman BahFEC filing: Iman Bah · H0AZ02216 ↗

  Raised

  $195

  Spent

  $75

  Cash on hand

  $225

  • Individuals 100% $195

  Campaign totals through Mar 31, 2026.

  No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

  No itemized operating expenditures from this candidate's principal campaign committee are in the FEC bulk file yet.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Mo Goldman, Samantha Severson, Johnathan Curtis Buma, Aiden Nicholette Swallow, Gary Swing, Carter Jordan Weeks.