Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

California U.S. House District 7

6 filings report $9.6M raised, and outside groups reported $1.5M in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · Filed as incumbent$7.8M15%16%70%$6.1M$2.0M$10$140K
Mai VangDemocrat · Filed as challenger$1.8M94%6%0%$1.4M$389K$859K$400K
Robert MorinDemocrat · Filed as challenger$30K100%0%0%$7,674$23K——
Erica LeeDemocrat · Filed as challenger$15K100%0%0%$15K$0——
Zachariah WoodenRepublican · Filed as challenger$850100%0%0%$850$0$129K—
Kathryn S MingRepublican · Filed as challenger$250%0%0%$25$0——

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · Doris O. Matsui

    In the U.S. House (CA-7) since 2005 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 24 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 1 committee: Energy and Commerce · 2 subcommittees
    • 288 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 3 committees reported outside spending for or against them

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H6CA05195) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $7.8M
    Spent
    $6.1M
    Cash on hand
    $2.0M
    Debts
    $5.4M
    • Individuals 15% $1.1M
    • PACs & other committees 16% $1.2M
    • Candidate's own money & loans 70% $5.4M

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $71K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $10 supporting · $140K opposing ($10 of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTIONSuper PAC $10

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $120K
    2. WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $20K

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEPAC with no sponsoring organization $10K
    2. MACHINISTS NON PARTISAN POLITICAL LEAGUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS & AEROSPACE WORKERSUnion PAC · International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers $10K
    3. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION RURAL BROADBAND PACTrade association PAC · National Telecommunications Cooperative Association $10K

    Where the money went $3.0M in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $3.0M of the $6.1M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 75% $2.2M
    • Consultants & strategy 5% $149K
    • Staff & payroll 5% $139K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 7% $210K
    • Polling, research & data 4% $119K
    • Travel, meals & events 0.1% $4,387
    • Office, technology & overhead 1% $36K
    • Legal & compliance 1% $31K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.2% $4,950
    • Other or unclassified 2% $57K

    Largest payees

    1. BUYING TIME $1.3M
    2. ORLATTLE LLC $527K
    3. ACOSTA CONSULTING $262K
    4. GRINDSTONE FIELD SOLUTIONS $178K
    5. DAVEY CONSULTING, LLC $126K

    Paid to individuals: $112K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 2, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (325 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $1.8M
    Spent
    $1.4M
    Cash on hand
    $389K
    Debts
    $24K
    • Individuals 94% $1.7M
    • PACs & other committees 6% $107K
    • Other receipts <0.1% $1,620

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $5,914 moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $859K supporting · $400K opposing ($748K of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. LEADERS WE DESERVEHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $348K
    2. NATIONAL NURSES UNITED FOR PATIENT PROTECTIONSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $300K
    3. WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $181K

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. AFFORDABLE CALIFORNIA 2026Super PACAll of its general-election spending helped Republicans or opposed Democrats $400K

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS FEDERAL COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONUnion PAC · National Union Of Healthcare Workers $10K
    2. JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account) $10K
    3. LEADERS WE DESERVEHybrid PAC (super PAC account) $10K

    Where the money went $971K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $971K of the $1.4M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 60% $579K
    • Consultants & strategy 14% $131K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 9% $90K
    • Polling, research & data 3% $30K
    • Travel, meals & events 0.8% $7,678
    • Office, technology & overhead 0.6% $5,891
    • Legal & compliance 2% $23K
    • Other or unclassified 11% $105K

    Largest payees

    1. MIDDLE SEAT CONSULTING, LLC $452K
    2. CARD SERVICE CENTER $67K
    3. MOVE US FORWARD, LLC $55K
    4. PEOPLE POWER LEADERSHIP, LLC $34K
    5. UPSWING RESEARCH & STRATEGY, LLC $30K

    Paid to individuals: $159K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Sep 7, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (242 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $30K
    Spent
    $7,674
    Cash on hand
    $23K
    Debts
    $20K
    • Individuals 100% $30K

    Campaign totals through Sep 30, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $6,139 in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $6,139 of the $7,674 the campaign reported spending through Sep 30, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Sep 17, 2026.

    • Fundraising & processing fees 11% $664
    • Office, technology & overhead 3% $163
    • Legal & compliance 87% $5,313

    Largest payees

    1. CJ & ASSOCIATES, INC $5,313
    2. ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES $664
    3. ZOHO CORPORATION $163

    Payments dated Jul 13, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (29 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $15K
    Spent
    $15K
    Cash on hand
    $0
    • Individuals 100% $15K

    Campaign totals through Oct 11, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $10K in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $10K of the $15K the campaign reported spending through Oct 11, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Oct 11, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 23% $2,364
    • Consultants & strategy 34% $3,500
    • Fundraising & processing fees 4% $385
    • Travel, meals & events 6% $656
    • Legal & compliance 33% $3,361

    Largest payees

    1. RIVER CITY BUSINESS SERVICES $3,361
    2. ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES $385
    3. CARD SERVICES CENTER $197

    Paid to individuals: $6,323, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jun 1, 2025 to Oct 11, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (48 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $850
    Spent
    $850
    Cash on hand
    $0
    • Individuals 100% $850

    Campaign totals through Sep 30, 2026.

    Outside groups: $129K supporting · $0 opposing

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. INCLUSION PACSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $129K

    Where the money went $850 in itemized spending

    • Fundraising & processing fees 5% $39
    • Office, technology & overhead 2% $15
    • Legal & compliance 94% $796

    Largest payees

    1. GREYFOX FINANCIAL SERVICES $796
    2. EFUNDRAISING CONNECTIONS $39
    3. CALIFORNIA BANK AND TRUST $15

    Payments dated May 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (9 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $25
    Spent
    $25
    Cash on hand
    $0
    • Other receipts 100% $25

    Campaign totals through Jan 28, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    No itemized operating expenditures from this candidate's principal campaign committee are in the FEC bulk file yet.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Enayat Nazhat, Robert Christian Richardson.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.