Skip to content
Hugin

2026 race · follow the money

New York U.S. House District 13

4 filings report $4.3M raised, and outside groups reported $10M in independent spending for or against them. Compare where each campaign's money came from and who spent to help or hurt it.

The count.

Checking the election sources…

Side by side.

Raised excludes transfers between a candidate's own committees. Shares are of that total. Filings appear in order of money raised; this includes primary candidates who are no longer running.

CandidateRaisedIndividualsPACsOwn moneySpentCashOutside forOutside against
Adriano EspaillatDemocrat · Filed as incumbent$2.8M81%19%0%$3.3M$9,410$5.6M$1.0M
Darializa Avila ChevalierDemocrat · Filed as challenger$1.5M96%4%0%$1.4M$155K$1.9M$1.5M
Oscar RomeroDemocrat · Filed as challenger$21K25%0%75%$20K$150——
Jaliel AmadorDemocrat · Filed as challenger$5,69999.7%0%0.3%$5,699$0——

Who spent from outside.

The largest independent spenders in this race, summed from each candidate's five largest spenders on each side.

  • BOLD AMERICASuper PACSpent mainly in primaries$1.5M against Darializa Avila Chevalier · $1.4M for Adriano Espaillat
  • PROGRESSIVE UNITY FUNDSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries$1.9M for Adriano Espaillat
  • JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries$1.0M for Darializa Avila Chevalier · $525K against Adriano Espaillat
  • AMERICAN PRIORITIES (AP)Super PACSpent mainly in primaries$844K for Darializa Avila Chevalier · $500K against Adriano Espaillat
  • LATINO VICTORY FUNDHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries$734K for Adriano Espaillat · $3,950 against Darializa Avila Chevalier
  • PROJECT 218Super PACSpent mainly in primaries$600K for Adriano Espaillat
  • UNITED FOR PROGRESSSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries$556K for Adriano Espaillat
  • INDIVISIBLE ACTIONHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries$30K for Darializa Avila Chevalier · $14K against Adriano Espaillat
  • CITIZENS AGAINST AIPAC CORRUPTIONHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries$5,000 for Darializa Avila Chevalier
  • EMGAGE FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries$4,673 for Darializa Avila Chevalier

Each campaign.

  • Sitting member of Congress · Adriano Espaillat

    In the U.S. House (NY-13) since 2017 · current term ends Jan 3, 2027

    • Recorded yea or nay on 24 of the 24 key House floor votes captured in Hugin's snapshot
    • 1 committee: Appropriations · 2 subcommittees
    • 151 committees reported contributions to them this cycle · 12 committees reported outside spending for or against them

    Linked to this filing by its exact FEC candidate ID (H2NY13096) in the congress-legislators roster of Oct 21, 2026. Votes are one key floor vote per bill on bills named in contractor lobbying reports (Oct 29, 2026); committee seats are the roster as of Oct 24, 2026; money counts are FEC reports for 2026 as of Oct 24, 2026. These are what Hugin's snapshots captured, not complete records, and none of them is a score or evidence of motive.

    Raised
    $2.8M
    Spent
    $3.3M
    Cash on hand
    $9,410
    • Individuals 81% $2.2M
    • PACs & other committees 19% $523K
    • Other receipts 0.5% $13K

    Campaign totals through Sep 30, 2026. Excludes $130K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $5.6M supporting · $1.0M opposing

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. PROGRESSIVE UNITY FUNDSuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $1.9M
    2. BOLD AMERICASuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $1.4M
    3. LATINO VICTORY FUNDHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $734K

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $525K
    2. AMERICAN PRIORITIES (AP)Super PACSpent mainly in primaries $500K
    3. INDIVISIBLE ACTIONHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $14K

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS COMMITTEEUnion PAC · Transport Workers Union Of America $10K
    2. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L EUnion PAC · American Federation Of State, County And Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio $10K
    3. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATIONUnion PAC $10K

    Where the money went $3.1M in itemized spending

    • Advertising & outreach 46% $1.4M
    • Consultants & strategy 16% $490K
    • Staff & payroll 1% $32K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 7% $212K
    • Polling, research & data 6% $183K
    • Travel, meals & events 6% $182K
    • Office, technology & overhead 5% $158K
    • Legal & compliance 2% $57K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.3% $9,122
    • Other or unclassified 12% $381K

    Largest payees

    1. HAMILTON CAMPAIGN NETWORK $923K
    2. IRONCLAD STRATEGIES $400K
    3. WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY $218K
    4. LINOPRESS NY $144K
    5. THE FROST GROUP $106K

    Paid to individuals: $534K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Jan 2, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (1,613 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $1.5M
    Spent
    $1.4M
    Cash on hand
    $155K
    • Individuals 96% $1.5M
    • PACs & other committees 4% $57K
    • Other receipts 0.4% $5,423

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026. Excludes $73K moved between the candidate's own committees.

    Outside groups: $1.9M supporting · $1.5M opposing ($552 of it designated for the general election)

    Biggest spenders supporting

    1. JUSTICE DEMOCRATS PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $1.0M
    2. AMERICAN PRIORITIES (AP)Super PACSpent mainly in primaries $844K
    3. INDIVISIBLE ACTIONHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $30K

    Biggest spenders opposing

    1. BOLD AMERICASuper PACSpent mainly in primaries $1.5M
    2. LATINO VICTORY FUNDHybrid PAC (super PAC account)Spent mainly in primaries $3,950
    3. LATINO VICTORY PROJECTFiler that is not a political committeeSpent mainly in primaries $2,600

    Largest direct PAC contributions

    1. A NEW POLICY PACHybrid PAC (super PAC account) $6,425
    2. UAW - V - CAP (UAW VOLUNTARY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM) 'INT'L UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA UAWUnion PAC · Int'L Union United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers Of America Uaw $5,000
    3. CONGRESSIONAL PROGRESSIVE CAUCUS PACPAC with no sponsoring organization $5,000

    Where the money went $1.1M in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $1.1M of the $1.4M the campaign reported spending through Oct 14, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Jun 30, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 62% $684K
    • Consultants & strategy 6% $63K
    • Staff & payroll 15% $170K
    • Fundraising & processing fees 5% $58K
    • Polling, research & data 3% $33K
    • Travel, meals & events 3% $29K
    • Office, technology & overhead 3% $29K
    • Legal & compliance 3% $33K
    • Contributions, transfers & refunds 0.2% $2,700
    • Other or unclassified 0.6% $7,000

    Largest payees

    1. MIDDLE SEAT $571K
    2. GUSTO $169K
    3. GOODMAN CAMPAIGNS $110K
    4. ACTBLUE TECHNICAL SERVICES $48K
    5. POCKETBOOK STRATEGIES $24K

    Paid to individuals: $48K, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Nov 19, 2025 to Jun 30, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (384 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $21K
    Spent
    $20K
    Cash on hand
    $150
    Debts
    $16K
    • Individuals 25% $5,083
    • Candidate's own money & loans 75% $16K

    Campaign totals through Oct 14, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $18K in itemized spending

    • Advertising & outreach 26% $4,756
    • Consultants & strategy 42% $7,700
    • Office, technology & overhead 28% $5,247
    • Legal & compliance 4% $784

    Largest payees

    1. NEXT DAY FLYERS $3,794
    2. RUN! $2,550
    3. SOLIDARITY SOFTWARE INC $2,005
    4. TRI-START OFFSET CORP. $784
    5. STAPLES $435

    Paid to individuals: $7,700, such as staff, contractors and reimbursements. People who were paid are not named here.

    Payments dated Oct 9, 2025 to Sep 10, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (52 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

  • Raised
    $5,699
    Spent
    $5,699
    Cash on hand
    $0
    • Individuals 99.7% $5,682
    • Candidate's own money & loans 0.3% $17

    Campaign totals through Feb 27, 2026.

    No independent expenditures for or against this filing are itemized in the bulk file.

    Where the money went $5,046 in itemized spending

    These itemized payments cover $5,046 of the $5,699 the campaign reported spending through Feb 27, 2026. The FEC has not yet itemized the rest in its bulk file, which runs to Feb 2, 2026.

    • Advertising & outreach 12% $581
    • Fundraising & processing fees 60% $3,000
    • Office, technology & overhead 15% $751
    • Legal & compliance 8% $383
    • Other or unclassified 7% $330

    Largest payees

    1. SOLE STRATEGIES $3,000
    2. BEST BUY CO., INC $751
    3. INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS: POLITICAL $713
    4. GOOGLE SUITE $581

    Payments dated Oct 20, 2025 to Feb 2, 2026, as itemized by the principal campaign committee in FEC reports (14 entries). Every payment on FEC.gov ↗

    Grouped by each campaign's own description of the payment, so the groups are approximate. Payments of $200 or less to one payee need not be itemized, detail filed only as memo entries counts under other or unclassified, and spending by the candidate's other committees or by outside groups is not included. A payment is not evidence of a favor or wrongdoing.

Also registered for this seat, with no campaign summary or outside spending in the bulk file: Matt Davies Miller, Theo Bruce Chino-Tavarez, James Felton Keith, Megan Catherine Rodriguez, Candace Martina Niles, Michael Hano, Jomo Williams, Gavin Solomon.

Use this race.

Put this seat's money card on your own page, or pull the figures as data. The FEC filings are public domain; please credit “Hugin (hugin.studio), from FEC filings” and link this page.

The card loads no scripts, cookies or trackers. Data: JSON · CSV · Markdown · API guide

FEC bulk data read November 4, 2026. Campaign totals come from each filing's own FEC summary through its latest processed report. Outside spending is independent expenditures itemized in committee reports in the FEC bulk files, primaries included; late 24- and 48-hour reports, party coordinated spending, communication costs and groups that do not report to the FEC are not included. Outside spending is, by law, made without coordinating with the candidate, and it is not the candidate's money. A contribution or expenditure is not evidence of a vote, favor or wrongdoing.