Skip to content
Hugin
A closed house door at the top of four concrete steps, with a dark stain band running across the foundation wall below the clapboard siding, on an overcast day.

Hugin News

GAO finds 86% of high-risk U.S. properties have no NFIP flood insurance, and says each fix it identifies would need an act of Congress

3 min read

Original editorial artwork generated for Hugin.

GAO's October 1 report to Congress finds 86 percent of U.S. properties it classifies as high flood risk carried no National Flood Insurance Program coverage as of April 2026, and estimates about 13 million such properties sit outside the FEMA zones that trigger the mandatory-purchase rule. Price, that narrow rule, and misreadings of what is covered all hold purchases down, GAO reports. It asks Congress, not FEMA, to consider widening the rule, publishing flood-risk data, requiring lender quotes, and raising coverage limits; one of five agencies that received the draft partly disagreed.

flood-insurancenfipfemacongressdisaster-recovery
3source receipts1source hosts3 minread timelinkedprimary source

The Government Accountability Office reported October 1 that 86 percent of U.S. properties it classifies as high flood risk carried no National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) coverage as of April 2026. It identifies four changes that could raise coverage, and says each would require statutory authority from Congress.

How GAO counted

GAO matched NFIP policy records to flood scores from First Street, a private risk-modeling company that rates a property 1 to 10 on the likelihood and projected depth of flooding; GAO treated 4 or higher as high risk. By that measure it estimates about 13 million high-risk properties sit outside the FEMA-mapped special flood hazard areas (SFHAs) that trigger the mandatory-purchase rule — well above the roughly 4 million FEMA's maps place inside those zones. Coverage stayed low even at the top: among properties scoring 10, 26 percent had NFIP coverage.

Why coverage is low

The mandatory-purchase rule, which applies only inside an SFHA to a mortgaged property, is "the primary driver of flood insurance purchase": an estimated 43 percent of properties in SFHAs had coverage, against 2 percent outside them, and FEMA's maps do not capture all flood risks, especially heavy rainfall. Price matters too: FEMA's Risk Rating 2.0, begun in October 2021, moves premiums toward each property's own risk, and stakeholders named rising premiums and affordability as primary reasons owners drop or decline coverage. GAO also documented misperceptions — that land outside an SFHA carries no risk, that homeowners insurance covers flood damage (most policies exclude it), or that federal disaster aid will cover a loss. For flood-related events from 2015 to 2025, it puts the average inflation-adjusted disaster payment at about $3,500, against about $88,700 for the average NFIP residential claim.

Who is exposed

In GAO's analysis of First Street data as of January 2024, the highest shares of high-risk properties were in Louisiana (45 percent), West Virginia (34 percent) and Florida (26 percent). Coverage did not track risk: less than 2 percent of West Virginia properties had flood insurance. Among four communities GAO visited, coverage of high-risk properties ranged from 5 percent in Buncombe County, North Carolina, hit by Hurricane Helene in 2024, to 52 percent in Orleans Parish, Louisiana.

What GAO recommends, and to whom

GAO's four proposals are "Matters for Congressional Consideration" — addressed to Congress, not recommendations to an agency: update the mandatory-purchase criteria to include all sources of flood risk, naming heavy rainfall; direct FEMA to collect and publish property-level flood-risk data; require lenders on federally backed mortgages to give homebuyers a flood-insurance quote before closing, and a signed risk disclosure if a buyer declines; and raise NFIP's coverage limits, now $250,000 for a one-to-four-family residential building, with a mechanism to adjust them periodically.

Agency reaction

GAO sent its draft to the Departments of Agriculture, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development and Veterans Affairs, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The Rural Housing Service, for Agriculture, supported the data-publication and coverage-limit matters but not the other two: widening the purchase criteria would significantly increase housing costs, it said, and a pre-closing quote and signed declination would create delays, documentation burdens and legal exposure. GAO said it stands by both. FEMA, for Homeland Security, gave technical comments only. HUD, VA and FHFA did not comment.

Source links